Not to dissuade you from your GIMP contributions (which sound amazing), but
have you considered using Inkscape instead of GIMP for these tasks? I also
have to do a bunch of Blender renders + composition/photo editing bits, and
since Inkscape can link in external files, and auto-updates them when
Imagemagick has a batch mode called "mogrify" so you can just use something
like this from the command line:
mogrify -format jpg -resize 3000 -define jpeg:extent=1000kb *.jpg
That will resize all jpegs in the directory to 3000px (height or width,
whichever is larger) and it will try to get close
I too would like to see this in GIMP by default.
Makes it easier to answer criticism like "GIMP doesn't have context aware
tools".
Very useful feature.
My 2p.
-C
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, 16:35 jEsuSdA 8), wrote:
> El 4/6/20 a las 16:29, Helmut Jarausch escribió:
> > On 06/03/2020 07:40:03 PM,
Thanks to everyone for all the hard work in 2019!
-C
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, 09:19 Alexandre Prokoudine via gimp-developer-list, <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our annual GIMP/GEGL report is out:
>
> https://www.gimp.org/news/2020/01/04/gimp-and-gegl-in-2019/
>
> Enjoy :)
>
>
fwiw, it's been a very long time since this tool worked. I used to use it
all the time, so I miss it too. It's a shame it's abandoned, as it was one
of the power tools of GIMP.
I'd like to offer a bounty to get someone to fix it, however, all I can
offer is design work (logos, avatars, wallpapers,
Hey folks, I see the GIMP logo has changed since 2.8.
I'd like to suggest the following patch to the logo, which improves the
overall look and scalability of the current design slightly.
Changes: made eye-outline black to better match the black outline effect of
the head, and added same width
Ooops! Didn't see it was changed. Yes, mine is an older version, please go
with what Michael's version.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:11 AM Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 14:41 +0200, David wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking for the Gimp logo for use in film credits.
> >
> >
Sure. Feel free to add it to the repo. That's what I made it for. :)
No credit needed.
-C
On Wed, 29 May 2019, 08:44 Shlomi Fish, wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 08:20:28 +0100
> C R via gimp-developer-list wrote:
>
> > I also made this vector one in svg format, if that suits be
I also made this vector one in svg format, if that suits better:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ouqyez32cer1veq/gimp_2.8_logo.svg?dl=1
-C
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:44 AM David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for the Gimp logo for use in film credits.
>
> Where can I find it in high quality?
>
>
>
Does GIMP clear undo memory associated with images that have been closed
(without closing GIMP)?
Thanks for the great answers, everyone. I'm learning a lot about GIMP
memory management here!
-C
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:14 AM Ofnuts wrote:
> On 2/5/19 5:35 PM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> > El 2/2/19 a
GIMP is better than Photoshop for my purposes. No, it's not trying to copy
(which I think is the actual problem most people have with GIMP), and
therefore does some things differently as a result, and the tools are not a
one-to-one match (thankfully).
It's also free, completely cross-platform, and
My GIMP pet peeves list is much longer than this, but I also see the
tremendous work being done by so very few dedicated individuals, and this
is why I temper my complaints with patience, understanding and gratitude.
It's more helpful for people to be involved with the project, and take time
to
Haha, just on April 1st, and only when you have not opened a document in a
while? Wow, that is an obscure Easter egg. I feel really hard-core to have
found that one!
I think until someone complains (for real), it's probably fine. Maybe patch
it to flash some other colour? Like purple, so it's not
, C R via gimp-developer-list wrote:
> > Maybe. The eyes flash red under certain circumstances. It's quite
> creepy...
> > Though this is not a new thing in GIMP.:)
>
> If this is an actual fact - that sometimes Wilbur's eyes flash a color -
> then here is a request tha
>
> Maybe the OP doesn't like Wilber's head in the empty image window.
>
Maybe. The eyes flash red under certain circumstances. It's quite creepy...
Though this is not a new thing in GIMP. :)
>
> ___
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:
n Reddit, and not
on this mailing list.
If that's the culture at GIMP, I'm not gonna cry. Just say it.
>
Be nice, and you can expect the same in most circumstances. That's not just
GIMP culture, that's life in general.
-C
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 16:00 C R wrote:
>
>> From a third par
ple) that PMed me are
> dicks, too.
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 16:59 C R wrote:
>
>>
>>> Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and
>>> therefore not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I
>>> was replyin
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:40 PM C R wrote:
>
>> Happy you've found that support group you were looking for. :)
>>
>> Wishing you a speedy trauma recovery,
>> -C
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, 11:04 Niccolo Brogi >
>>> ...in the meantime, I'm gettin
As someone who has worked many years alongside (at the desk next to)
customer service reps, I can verify that no amount of organisation or
pleasantries can quell the entitlement of anyone who thinks you owe them
something. Be that x feature in GIMP, or x release date for the next GIMP.
People are
I second that. Thanks to everyone who makes GIMP awesome.
No need to use Photoshop instead though, just be constructive.
If you see yourself as part of the community, you realise you're talking
with friends working for a common goal. This is the attitude that motivates
change to make GIMP better
t away after the fact?
Don't feign innocence, you're not convincing anyone.
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:39 PM C R wrote:
>
>> I said spreading falsehoods about GIMP was a "dick move", and it is.
>> I ended my last reply with "look in the mirror" as i
I said spreading falsehoods about GIMP was a "dick move", and it is.
I ended my last reply with "look in the mirror" as in, look how you're
treating people in the GIMP community. Is that how you want to be treated?
No? Then stop it. :)
___
From a third party perspective, this is where things kicked off in the
thread:
"I didn't say you didn't include any features users ask for, I was just
justifying me complaining.
Why do you guys have to get so pissy so quickly, is it GIMP's code that
makes you that, or you have to pass a
Fortunately you can see exactly how developers are making modifications to
GIMP on gitlab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp
So the easy answer is that developers use a system called git to commit
changes to GIMP.
Hope it helps.
-C
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, 07:30 Alexandre Prokoudine, <
Likewise, make sure you only download from GIMP.org
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
> On Monday, May 7, 2018, 12:24:59, Casper Børgesen wrote:
>
>> I expect the your file to be fine and Symantec to falsely detect it as
>> containing a virus.
>
> We can't
Thanks for all the work! Well deserved beers indeed!
Cheers!
-C
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:44:32 +0200
> Michael Natterer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After 6 years of development...
>>
>> We just released GIMP
GIMP is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
ANY SMOKEABILITY; without even the implied warranty of SMOKEABILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULARLY INEXPENSIVE HIGH. See the GNU General
Public License for more details.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Michael Schumacher
As a designer who uses the latest development builds of GIMP every day in
production, and also the latest Krita, I can confirm there is no such code
in GIMP, nor in the 9 or so years in which I have used GIMP have I
encountered any of the issues described. I've always gotten GIMP from
GIMP.org and
> I just wanted to add that Kris is the person who makes things happen in
> GIMP for macOS. As far as I am concerned, as said earlier, he is therefore
> the one who should call the shots regarding such macOS build questions,
> rather than a vote (unless he wants to decide through a vote himself)
>
Is it possible to task the student(s) with getting more GEGL integration?
GIMP really needs that to speed up image processing and previews.
I mean like REALLY REALLY needs that more than just about any new toys
they can dream up. :)
My 2p.
-C
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Alexandre
Whoever recently fixed the speed problems on the unified transform
previews, omgTHANKYOU!
:D
Thanks everyone for the hard work improving GIMP.
-C
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership:
I mean, I've definitely lost work because I forgot to hit Ctrl+S
occasionally... but 3 hours? That's not something I'd personally blame on
developers... nor admit to an entire mailing list. :)
Just a thought.
-C
On 27 Dec 2017 9:42 pm, "Name Brand" wrote:
> yeah
Can you post one of your raw files somewhere? It will make it easier to
advise a solution. :)
-C
On 13 Dec 2017 00:34, "Deb Kennedy via gimp-developer-list" <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> I am new to programand I am puzzled by the conversion I had to do in order
> to open the files I
Krita currently has an implementation of this in addition to just
filters attached to specific layers.
Maybe it's worth looking over their shoulders for ideas, as they seem
to have handled it quite well.
Thanks for your work on GIMP!
-C
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, sigetch
Thanks a lot Ben!
-C
On 25 Jun 2017 15:21, "Ben" <draekko.softw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just an update to say i've uploaded a new patch that fixes saving so now
> the editor should work fine.
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 06/21/2017 09:03 AM, C R wrote:
&g
Was going to recommend this myself. I agree with Alex's suggestion:
Personally, I'd rather see a combobox in JPEG exporting options to select
background color, with these options: Black, White, Current Background
Color, Cyrrent Foreground Color.
Alex
If we do this, there is no need for a
-hackfest. :)
-C
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Ben <draekko.softw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi C R,
>
> Updated the patch per Mitch's requirements, and fixed some issues with the
> importer/exporter portion of the code. That part probably needs more stress
> testing than i ma
Hi Francesco - no need to be sorry. :)
Regarding your question, GIMP should be able to import and export EPS,
so it was not a concious decision to stop supporting the format or
anything. In fact in 2.9x development versions it's still there, still
working (both import and export).
To export the
I find conversation typically more friendly on IRC. Also, it's really
awesome to be able to chat with project devs and others in the
community in near real-time capacity. It's also easier to joke and
share stuff without the need to spam the whole mailing list (not that
anyone is doing that). My
Why just gimp? Why not include Inkscape, & Scribus, etc. and call it Remote
Design Studio (RDS) for short?
Just a thought.
-C
On 4 Apr 2017 7:48 a.m., "Simon Budig" wrote:
> Hi Miguel.
>
> Entertainment Mobile wrote:
> > My understanding is that GIMP trademark and logo is free
017 at 10:53 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I will do a complete write up and video with my suggestions.
>> Thanks for your help, pippin! :)
>>
>> PS - I joined your Patreon last month. Are you getting the funds okay?
>> I've never signed up to one of th
Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:14 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the update. Is it possible it implement my temporary fix in
>> the meanwhile?
>> Not saying it should be a blocker, but it would help tremendously in
>
ote:
> What you proposed sounds very sensible to me. It would help a lot of
> situations, and I don't see any which it would harm.
>
> 4 mar 2017 6:51 PM "C R" <caj...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> The bad news is that opaque is still the default, so you have to t
The bad news is that opaque is still the default, so you have to take
time to adjust the opacity mode each and every time you restart GIMP.
Thus, if you want to transform the layer in relation to what's under
it, you have to follow these steps:
1.Start the transform (scale, rotate, unified
Hey folks. Welcome back from Wilber Week. I had some nice comments
from a student of mine who has taken up GIMP after I taught her how to
get started using it for her artwork. She will be making commercial
products with it, as I do, and I asked her to write up a quick summary
of what she said to
Thanks for sharing! :)
I like the idea of reducing Wilber to some basic shapes.
Here are two more options for consideration:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/83ar1veirxmxba9/AADOngL7UG97CAbp2zqQLt_qa?dl=0
I think Wilber with no eyes looks more professional. However losing
the eyes does change the
a few years back.
Let me know if it would be useful to update these as well.
-C
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:52 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> If you look in the source (docs) you will find the wilber construction kit
>> as well as an svg. Been there forever
&g
> If you look in the source (docs) you will find the wilber construction
kit as well as an svg. Been there forever
Think that falls under that "lost in the a git archive somewhere" thing I
said earlier...
What I'm saying is if the project wants it to be available to users, it
should be on the
Grrr, Wilbur -> Wilber! ;)
On 29 Jan 2017 6:48 p.m., "C R" <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did an "Internet search" before making it, as none available at the time
> were based off the 2.8 splash screen version. This is why I made one, and
> then shared it
a resource.
-C
On 29 Jan 2017 6:21 p.m., "Kevin Cozens" <ke...@ve3syb.ca> wrote:
On 2017-01-28 04:14 PM, C R wrote:
> It seems to be missing from the official GIMP Wilber downloads page,
> but a few years ago I made Wilbur in Inkscape, and gave it to the
> project.
&g
Yes I spelt it wrong a few times. It's me though. Is anyone shocked at this
point? ;)
On 28 Jan 2017 10:40 p.m., "Tobias Ellinghaus" <h...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 21:14:56 CET schrieb C R:
> > Wilbur
>
> Wilber ;-)
>
r? Other than
> this email I suppose?
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:14 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It seems to be missing from the official GIMP Wilber downloads page,
>> but a few years ago I made Wilbur in Inkscape, and gave it to the
>> project.
>>
It seems to be missing from the official GIMP Wilber downloads page,
but a few years ago I made Wilbur in Inkscape, and gave it to the
project.
It's probably lost in a git archive somewhere. :)
I've included a temporary link to it if the project wants to put it up
for folks to use (no attribution
Can you describe how you intend to modify it?
Also, it would be a good idea to make sure the version you want to
modify is an official one, and not one someone else made, because
those can be copyright, just as yours might be if you made a variation
of it.
See here (describes linking,
art rather than "parasite", but
> changing that now would be quite an involved process.
>
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:22 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This message keeps popping up every time I open an image from dropbox
>> :
>> Execut
This message keeps popping up every time I open an image from dropbox
:
Execution error for procedure 'gimp-image-attach-parasite':
'gimp-comment' parasite validation failed: comment contains invalid UTF-8
I would at least suppress this warning by default if there's no good
way of fixing the
It's been like that for ages. I'll go ahead and file a bug report, if no
one wants to fix it, or can't quickly.
Thanks.
-C
On 18 Dec 2016 6:12 pm, "Simon Budig" <si...@budig.de> wrote:
> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Uh. In what way isn't that the case cur
> Uh. In what way isn't that the case currently?
Try Alt-C, s for hue/saturation
Then try it again after you complete the hue saturation action
On the second run alt-C, s skips to Colourise
Thanks.
-C
>
> GTK+ cycles through all the "conflicting" mnemonics. So (for british
> english) ALT-C, s,
Neither of these appear to be violating the GPL. Unless there's proof
otherwise, the very worst that happens is more people get to be aware
of and use GIMP.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:03 AM, JOSEPH
The GPL allows selling of GIMP provided the source code is also offered.
This particular listing also packages value added clip art, etc.
It should be determined beforehand that the GPL has been violated in order
to report a listing.
More info here: https://www.gimp.org/about/selling.html
-C
I will, I was just hoping it might be a quick fix.
Thanks.
-C
On 17 Dec 2016 1:27 pm, "Jehan Pagès" <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:30 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > however could you fix the ones I've
t;>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:10 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Alex.
>> >
>> > And I'm still getting overlaping hotkeys with:
>>
>> Ok so it seems you are talking of something different from what
&
:38 am, "Jehan Pagès" <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:10 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Alex.
> >
> > And I'm still getting overlaping hotkeys with:
>
> Ok so it seems you are talk
> Already available since 2.9.2 :)
Oh hells yes! hotkeyed and everything! : hit the forward slash.
Thanks for pointing that out, Alexandre!
One small tweak: can the search pop up under the mouse cursor?
If one is using focus-follows-mouse in their wm (like I do), it's a
mad rush to mouse over
+1
This is one of my favourite features of the Blender 3D UI.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:14 PM, M. Hammoud wrote:
> Hi.
> New users spend a lot of time looking for an effect / filter / brush / tool
> / pattern in the multiple menu tabs, each with a long list of submenus,
>
The Colour menu has again become a mess of conflicting hotkeys.
Can someone reassign/resolve them?
Probably a good idea to get rid of some of the duplicate functions
like "drop shadow" and the proliferation of duplicate desaturate
actions. :)
If help is needed picking the best versions to keep,
One of my recent contacts emailed me today with this thankyou note.
Really, it's a thankyou to the devs and community of GIMP, so I thought I'd
share (with permission, of course):
"Thank you for sending me to Blender 3D.
I like it. I am learning to use it.
Please know that I have slowly got our
about SHA1 security was quite amusing).
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/show.cgi?id=linus-about-security-of-sha1
Hehehe.
Cheers.
-C
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@shlomifish.org> wrote:
> Hi C R!
>
> (or in the spirit of Talk Like a Pirate
Yes, I always ask, because more often than not, it's just something small
that's got them stuck. This particular user had tried GIMP, and "found it
hard to use". I couldn't get any more clarification, as it was apparently
"several years ago" that they had tried to use GIMP and had "forgotten the
omplain.
-C
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 at 15:57 C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK, on Inkscape things just looks a bit uglier. On Gimp, it's either
>>> lose half the pixels, OR view everything at 2x zoomed.
>>
>>
>> So... zooming OUT is out of the question for som
>
> AFAIK, on Inkscape things just looks a bit uglier. On Gimp, it's either
> lose half the pixels, OR view everything at 2x zoomed.
So... zooming OUT is out of the question for some strange reason? :P
(snip)
>
I lived through many mysteriously blurred images before I realized what was
>
Not to mention that GNU/Linux is NOT a Unix. ;P
At any rate, still curious to hear from real developers in the GIMP
project, and motivation for working on the project.
If I want to hear about why Mac enthusiasts don't like GIMP (or Inkscape),
I'll defo post the question to the GIMP user mailing
I run a London Linux Meet, where a bunch of Linux and open source folks
have drinks and discuss Linux, and free software.
At the last meet I was showing off GIMP, as I often do when asked "what do
you do?" There's the usual ooohing and ahhing as I show what GIMP allows me
to do easily as a
08 Sep 2016, at 09:01, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Indeed. I'm finding the speed to be roughly the same as I'm used to with
> the GIMP ppa.
>
> Out of curiosity, is it possible to package a different set of GIMP
> defaults with an AppImage?
> For example, say I want
the preview opacity to 75% during all transformations
3. Map (or remap) hotkeys
Is there a way to do this in an AppImage?
Thanks!
-C
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Carmelo DrRaw <aferrero1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 07 Sep 2016, at 22:28, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
This is fantastic! I could see this become my preferred way to use GIMP.
G'MIC works like a charm, can't make it break. Used a 2000x2000 test image,
and it just flies!
Well done, and thanks!
-C
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Carmelo DrRaw
wrote:
> Thanks, it worked!!!
Tested with:
Ubuntu 16.04 (64bit) with Gnome 3.18.5, 16GB RAM, Lenovo X220 Tablet,
Intel® Core™ i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz × 4
All works well! Does this contain the MyPaint brush library? I can't seem
to find it if it's included.
Also, I only get the message "Should a desktop file ..." on the first
I'll be happy to test on Ubuntu 16.04
-C
On 5 Aug 2016 10:00 am, "Carmelo DrRaw" wrote:
> Last night I have prepared a first appimage for testing. It contains:
>
> - BABL, GEGL and GIMP from git
> - all default mypaint brushes
> - G’MIC plug-in from version 1.7.5_pre
ook me so long to have a closer look, this
> is all done in free time of which I can't generate more, but
> I also can't push patches I'm not happy with just because of
> lack of time.
>
> Dunno how to proceed, the patch will clearly go in in some
> form, do you still want to
Thanks to everyone for making this happen! I'm certainly looking forward to
trying out the new toys, fixes and revisions.
Cheers, and great work!
-C
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We just released the second development snapshot in the
> GIMP
Hi Ben / Draekko software.
Looks Like Mich asked you to come to IRC to discuss changes to the patch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759601
Can you follow up with him?
Thanks, for your work and your continued help to make the patch a part of
GIMP.
-C
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:21 PM,
> 1. I think the pencil tool should be renamed "Pixel Tool" if it's to stay
> > in the Tool box.
> > Reasons:
> > A. Jaggies don't make for realistic simulated pencil marks
> > B. There are better pencil-simulation tools in the Brush palate
>
> I am not sure that renaming a tool that old would
On Thursday 23 June 2016 08:43:55 C R wrote:
> > To recap:
> >
> > 1. I think the pencil tool should be renamed "Pixel Tool" if it's to stay
> > in the Tool box.
> > Reasons:
> > A. Jaggies don't make for realistic simulated pencil marks
> > B
n 23, 2016 at 7:20 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the interests of moving on with more important things than the
> symantics of "we", I can attempt to extract the team aspect from my
> verbiage.
>
> I can say for example: "It can be done this way."
e, but if it allows us to move forward
with discussing GIMP UI and features, then I'll do my best.
-C
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:06 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So when I say "we can do this", I should say "I can do this"?
> I do wonder if people actually read what
So when I say "we can do this", I should say "I can do this"?
I do wonder if people actually read what I post. :)
-C
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:34 AM, JLuc <j...@no-log.org> wrote:
> As for the "we"
> Le 22/06/2016 22:48, C R a écrit :
>
>>
hat we, might do or
might want to do in the future, then I've missed the point entirely.
On 22 Jun 2016 8:31 pm, "Tobias Ellinghaus" <h...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 June 2016 18:28:45 C R wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Already answered this before. "W
. When I talk about things we are discussing related to GIMP, I
use "we" with the qualifier "can" because we can do it, if we decide we
want to. I'm not saying "we will", notice. Is that what you think? That I'm
trying to represent everyone, and make decisions for them? I
Hi Elle. :) Thanks for your input...
> I think Americo's suggestion (original topic of thread) was that the
> Hardness slider be removed from the list of options for the Pencil, simply
> because this slider doesn't seem to affect the actual paint applied using
> the Pencil.
>
Yes. I think we
>
> You know, I actually reread, and I find the thread highly confusing.
>
I'll try to help explain, if it's not going to upset you...
> It starts with the hardness-parameter in the pencil tool, then goes on
> to how paintbrush is so similiar to the pencil tool, how the pencil tool
> can get
I did, I just misunderstood. :) I also replied about it too with a
possibly better solution to brush presets problems.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, C R wrote:
> >> &
Ah, I think I see.
The presets could be stored as they are now, and the tool simply switched
with the checkmark.
We could also think about storing presets via brush instead of via tool.
That would be much more useful, imho.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com>
>
> > I still recommend adding the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though
>
> That would involve somehow making GIMP to switch presets when swapping
> Wacom pens, for starters. As Liam pointed out before.
>
Why would pen presets be affected?
Also, we could just have the checkbox switch to
things to decide. I still recommend adding
the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though, to use to test agains
these other methods.
-C
>
>
> -Petteri
>
>
> On 22.6.2016 13:40, Simon Budig wrote:
>
>> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hav
>
>
> Ah, sorry. I missed that we're discussing hypothetical future
> characteristics of the tools here. I was just looking at the current
> difference between the pencil and the paintbrush tool.
>
Yes, it saves time if everyone reads the entire thread before commenting.
I'm guilty of this too
> Have you actually tried to do what I outlined above?
>
>
Have you? lol
No - I haven't. It's not currently possible to turn off anti-aliasing on
the brush tool, so it's not possible to "test" it.
However, knowing how anti-aliasing works, your statement is incorrect...
The paintbrush tool
> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
>
> Again, no.
>
> Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
> the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a huge differ
A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
-C
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 21/06/16 17:00, Americo Gobbo wrote:
>
>>
>> the Pencil tool is a classic.
>>
>
> A little-used classic. It has its uses (pixel art), but on the whole
>
> While tossing around wild ideas, what about allowing people to add tool
> presets to their toolbox? That way you could have your pencil back by
> adding
> such a preset.
>
For the two tools in question, this feature already exists. It's called the
"Brushes" palate. ;)
-C
>
> Tobias
>
option.
My 2p.
-C
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Ofnuts <ofn...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't we instead get rid of the pencil tool and add a no-anti-aliasing
> option to the brush?
>
> On 20/06/16 20:51, C R wrote:
>
>> Yep, may as well. lol
>> -C
>>
>
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo