On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:54 AM Carmelo DrRaw
wrote:
> Hi Jehan,
>
> On 16 Sep 2018, at 21:55, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
>>
>>
> Also at some point, we should resume discussing making your package
> upstream. It's hard to make time to discuss this, but this is probably
> needed. Moreover
Hi Jehan,
> On 16 Sep 2018, at 21:55, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
>
> Also at some point, we should resume discussing making your package upstream.
> It's hard to make time to discuss this, but this is probably needed. Moreover
> lately the maintainer of the Snap package approached
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:03 PM Carmelo DrRaw via gimp-developer-list <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:28, Ell wrote:
> >
> >
> >> A note to the developers: the current 2.10.x branch requires a quite
> >> recent version of Glib, but only due to the
Hi!
> On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:28, Ell wrote:
>
>
>> A note to the developers: the current 2.10.x branch requires a quite
>> recent version of Glib, but only due to the use of a single function
>> in app/gui/splash.c, and only for diagnostics purposes. To circumvent
>> the problem and be able to
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:59:26 +0200
Carmelo DrRaw via gimp-developer-list
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> recently I have done additional work on the GIMP AppImage packages,
> trying to improve the compatibility with various linux distributions
> and improving the building/packaging scripts.
>
> In a
Dear all,
recently I have done additional work on the GIMP AppImage packages, trying to
improve the compatibility with various linux distributions and improving the
building/packaging scripts.
In a nutshell:
* I have moved the build environment to CentOS 7, which is based on glibc 2.17
* the
