Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

2014-02-07 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi Roman - when you talk about a "3.0" manual version in "3.0" - I am with the impression that the purposed changes would take place before GIMP 3.0 itself (as the next version shall be 2.10) So - it looks like the purposed version numbering would dissociate the manual version from GIMP's version

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

2014-02-06 Thread Roman Joost
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: > > > > > > http://wiki.gimp.org/index

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

2014-02-06 Thread Michael Natterer
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: > > > > http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main > > > > Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

2014-02-05 Thread Jehan Pagès
Hi, On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost wrote: > Hi, > > I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: > > http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main > > Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go > ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's

[Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

2014-02-05 Thread Roman Joost
Hi, I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's feasibility. If there are no objections or comments I'd basically cal