Hi all!
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:25 AM Ofnuts via gimp-developer-list <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> I'm not convinced this needs to be an enum. The basic problem it to
> show a list of strings, and return the index of the selected one. The
> contents of the list can be quite
Yes, the proposal seems to have been shot down already. I don't think it
will work.
See a discussion https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/merge_requests/709
I paraphrase here and might not be accurately describing things
The primary goal is to let plugin authors refer to enums
Not really. With the current interface, I manage it that way:
I have these two functions:
def createOpts(name,pairs):
optsclass=namedtuple(name+'Type',[symbol for symbol,label in
pairs]+['labels','labelTuples'])
opts=optsclass(*(
range(len(pairs))
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022, 6:25 PM Ofnuts via gimp-developer-list <
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> I'm not convinced this needs to be an enum. The basic problem it to
> show a list of strings, and return the index of the selected one. The
> contents of the list can be quite dynamic. As far
I'm not convinced this needs to be an enum. The basic problem it to
show a list of strings, and return the index of the selected one. The
contents of the list can be quite dynamic. As far as I can tell, in 2.10
they aren't cached in pluginrc. In 3.0, the query/init methods of the
plugin suggest
I continued to prototype this.
Proved that a plugin can cross the wire to GIMP with
gimp_procedure_add_enum.
It creates a dynamic GEnum on both sides of the wire.
But it revealed these problems:
1. GIMP crashes when it starts the second time after installation,
I suppose when it is reading
More information since my last email
I prototyped this. Using GTypeModule, a dynamically loaded module which
declares dynamic types.
So far, I seem to be able to create a dynamic GEnum on the plugin side.But
I think it crashes on the GIMP side of the wire.That is, the plugin creates
a
This is a continuation of a thread on this list:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2022-July/msg00016.html.
The thread diverged to a discussion about future PF_OPTION implementation
in GIMP 3.
Here are my preliminary thoughts.
A PF_OPTION, in the old PyGimp, or a SF_OPTION, in
