Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On 11/24/17 19:06, Kevin Cozens wrote: Le 04/10/2017 à 15:51, Elle Stone a écrit : So a byte is 8 times a bit? For people like me who can never remember the difference between a byte and a bit, is there a one-sentence explanation for why there are bytes *and* bits? Perhaps a food analogy

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote: > Le 04/10/2017 à 15:51, Elle Stone a écrit : > >> So a byte is 8 times a bit? For people like me who can never remember the >> difference between a byte and a bit, is there a one-sentence explanation >> for why there are

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Le 04/10/2017 à 15:51, Elle Stone a écrit : So a byte is 8 times a bit? For people like me who can never remember the difference between a byte and a bit, is there a one-sentence explanation for why there are bytes *and* bits? Perhaps a food analogy might help you remember the difference

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

> For people like me who can never remember the > difference between a byte and a bit, is there a one-sentence explanation for > why there are bytes *and* bits? As Jehan mentioned, a bit is simply a holder for one 0 or 1 value (a yes or no answer). A byte is 8 of those answers. Why 8? Old ( and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 10/04/2017 09:02 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jehan Pagès >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi again! >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Elle

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On 10/04/2017 09:02 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hi! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hi again! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Elle Stone wrote: Actually the image is at 32-bit floating point precision, all the layers

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: > Hi again! > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Elle Stone > wrote: >> On 10/03/2017 09:33 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: >>> >>> I don't know how this info is computed in GIMP code (i.e.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi again! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 10/03/2017 09:33 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: >> >> I don't know how this info is computed in GIMP code (i.e. does it >> check for actual memory size or does it do some basic maths as I am >> about to do),

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi, On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 10/03/2017 09:40 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: >> >> Hi again! >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Elle Stone >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/03/2017 01:21 PM, Simon Budig wrote:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On 10/03/2017 09:40 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hi again! On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Elle Stone wrote: On 10/03/2017 01:21 PM, Simon Budig wrote: The current generation XCF files can contain compressed image data. When I save XCF files I don't use the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On 10/03/2017 09:33 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote: I don't know how this info is computed in GIMP code (i.e. does it check for actual memory size or does it do some basic maths as I am about to do), but assuming your image is 8 bits per channel, and all 7 layers are the size of the image and have no

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi again! On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 10/03/2017 01:21 PM, Simon Budig wrote: >> >> The current generation XCF files can contain compressed image data. > > > When I save XCF files I don't use the option in the Save dialog to compress >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

Hi, On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > I was curious about the disparity in reported size between the size on disk > in a file manager, and the size reported by "%m". I'm guessing "%m" is the > size in memory? > > For example, I have a GIMP 2.9

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size on disk vs size reported on status bar

On 10/03/2017 01:21 PM, Simon Budig wrote: The current generation XCF files can contain compressed image data. When I save XCF files I don't use the option in the Save dialog to compress the data. Is there some other compression going on automatically? Best, Elle