Bruce wrote:
[I will snip here quite a bit to keep this post from ballooning]
Hi guys, I'm the Bruce that Peter referred to in the first post in this
thread.
How open does it make sense to be?
I think a good approach is to be open to the degree where it is constructive
and feels
On 17 May 2012 16:19, peter sikking pe...@mmiworks.net wrote:
a couple of days ago Bruce appeared on irc and we had a chat.
(Bruce is now subscribed to this list)
within a minute we were talking about whether GIMP has a list
of known UI design issues. as far as I know we do not have one,
it
guys,
a couple of days ago Bruce appeared on irc and we had a chat.
(Bruce is now subscribed to this list)
within a minute we were talking about whether GIMP has a list
of known UI design issues. as far as I know we do not have one,
it is certainly not part of gui.gimp.org.
(I am not talking
Hi Peter,
my opinion is 'the clearer the better'.
Such a list could IMHO improve GIMPs product quality.
Even if it will be a long list (and it will be growing, as user
requirements and wishes always become more) this will show the necessity
to priorize.
I'm not (or not yet) a GIMP developer,
