On 11/24/12, Elle Stone l.elle.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out it wasn't the babl files after all, and it wasn't any Gimp
code, either. I didn't write the gegl iterators correctly (thank you
Mike Henning for writing the patch and showing how the iterators
should be written!).
Hello
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Tobias Jakobs tobias.jak...@gmail.comwrote:
with all this changes and the recent work in git it looks very promising.
Thank you and every one from the Gimp Team who help for this work. Could
you perhaps give us short status update about what is now working and
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com wrote:
... sigh... Let me explain this again.
Yes, we're all shaking our heads.
(I was bitten by the smarmy 'you're wrong! I know what you want to do,
but I'll not do it!' dialog several times tonight alone... nothing
like
--- En date de : Mer 28.11.12, Monty Montgomery xiphm...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM,
Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com
wrote:
... sigh... Let me explain this again.
Yes, we're all shaking our heads.
(I was bitten by the smarmy 'you're wrong! I know what you
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing what the user
wants, expects, and the code is perfectly capable of doing.
Could you please for the love of any deity
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing what the user
wants, expects, and the code
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Though a democratic process is no substitute for a scientific process
(and maybe UI design is scientific, who knows?), in this case we must
pay heed to our users.
Democracy is overrated :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/28/2012 05:12 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
So please, for the love of god, change the 'fuck you' dialog to
something that doesn't slap the user instead of doing
Hello!
I have a little trouble with the mailing list: whenever I write a replay
(pressing replay to list in thunderbird) I don't see after that my
message in the thread: what is the matter?
Cheers, Dima
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012, 17:19:14, Dima Ursu wrote:
I have a little trouble with the mailing list: whenever I write a replay
(pressing replay to list in thunderbird) I don't see after that my
message in the thread: what is the matter?
GMail - it hides your own messages.
--
Jernej
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Elle Stone l.elle.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Tobias Jakobs tobias.jak...@gmail.comwrote:
with all this changes and the recent work in git it looks very promising.
Thank you and every one from the Gimp Team who help for this work.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Elle Stone l.elle.st...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted a list of proposed additions/enhancements to the lcms.c plugin and
would like some feedback on what to start working on next
(http://ninedegreesbelow.com/temp/gimp-lcms-8.html). For instance,
*snip*
*I haven't
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
*I haven't yet added in code that handles Gimp's 16-bit floating point and
32-bit integer image types. Are these image types being used by anyone?
16bit integer can perhaps be useful for various scientific
applications that GIMP thus far
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
*I haven't yet added in code that handles Gimp's 16-bit floating point and
32-bit integer image types. Are these image types being used by anyone?
It is my opinion that XYZ is not fully replaced by infinite gamut linear
RGB if only because XYZ has a channel which is a proper luminance channel.
RGB does not.
Enough to deserve a place within GIMP? Don't know. If my (initial) inputs
and (final) outputs are sRGB, linear RGB with sRGB primaries
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Nicolas Robidoux
nicolas.robid...@gmail.com wrote:
It is my opinion that XYZ is not fully replaced by infinite gamut linear RGB
if only because XYZ has a channel which is a proper luminance channel. RGB
does not.
Enough to deserve a place within GIMP? Don't
As mitch and I discussed on irc, as the plan stands right now, the
GIMP won't have any working color profile.
Going forward, AFAIK, the image-mode-assign/convert color profile
menu entries should be removed from the lcms plugin, and everything
automatically converted to srgb/R'G'B' on import.
I
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
Democracy is overrated :)
Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
fruit... and revolutions.
The save/export decision is boneheaded, stubborn, condescending, and
obviously wrong. Not in concept, but in
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
Democracy is overrated :)
Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
fruit... and revolutions.
Revolutions? :D
So far it looks rather like I'm going to be
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 05:30:35 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
Democracy is overrated :)
Agreed. But despots get their feedback primarily through overripe
fruit... and
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:13:05 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
All right, let's stop this nonsense.
After reading that I honestly expected that it's going to end at...
You have every right to do what you please with GIMP.
But no, it
21 matches
Mail list logo
