Continuing on from the discussion on IRC earlier this week about pixel-aligned
icons, I re-drew the gimp-gravity-* icons to align for the current 24x24 size.
However, when then trying them on 2.9.3.2cd687a I found that the icon-theme is
requesting size 20x20 and therefore the 24x24 are being re
Am 21.02.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Kevin Payne:
> So my question is this: Is there a way to get a correct list of all
> the required icon sizes as the current reference, icon-list.mk file,
> is inaccurate?
IMO our next step should be to restore the previous colored icons and
work on the new ones as a
I've been playing around with the "Adjust Hue\Lightness\Saturation"
color tool. However, there are some things that are not behaving the way
I expect them to.
1. When adjusting the Red channel by itself, it also adjusts gray colors
at the same time. This does not happen with the other channels
I've been playing around with the "Adjust Hue\Lightness\Saturation"
color tool. However, there are some things that are not behaving the way
I expect them to.
1. When adjusting the Red channel by itself, it also adjusts gray colors
at the same time. This does not happen with the other channels
But that is partly my point - The original icons are apparently the wrong size,
so my question stands: How to determine what sizes are required?
--- Original Message ---
From: "Michael Schumacher"
Sent: 21 February 2016 10:39
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Payne wrote:
> But that is partly my point - The original icons are apparently the wrong
> size, so my question stands: How to determine what sizes are required?
>
I had already noticed this discrepancy in our code. We are actually
requesting for a GTK
>From: Jehan Pagès
>Sent: 21 February 2016 17:24
>To: Kevin Payne
>Cc: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon sizes required
>Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Payne wrote:
> But that is partly my point - The original i