Joao:
Read the article!
My guess is that the SR scheme combines two things:
1) Look for similar things at the same scale within the image to
reconstruct a platonic ideal which you then replicate (this is
super-resolution using data from the same image; classical
super-resolution uses multiple
On 23 August 2012 08:55, Nicolas Robidoux nicolas.robid...@gmail.com wrote:
Before starting to program SR, I would also contact the authors and ask
1) If they are, or know people who are, willing to help
2) If there are patents that get in the way.
On the other hand - how is your work going?
On the other hand - how is your work going? Are you making it avalilable as a
GEGL OP as well?
Yes, that's always been the plan. But everything else I do has been
taking a lot longer than expected...
At least, I think that I've come to the point where my methods are
just about as good as they
One last grumpy comment: Look at the right nostril of the baby. It's
pure fiction.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
Sorry: Left nostril.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
On 23 August 2012 09:07, Nicolas Robidoux nicolas.robid...@gmail.com wrote:
One last grumpy comment: Look at the right nostril of the baby. It's
pure fiction.
Since we are to this - one of the thigns that had impressed me the
most is the border of the yellow helmets
of the workers - on one of
On 19/08/12 15:26, David Thurgood wrote:
Dear Sir,
I apologise, in advance, if this is the wrong e-mail address to use, but I
confess to finding the GIMP lists rather confusing. Please forward this to
the most appropriate GIMP developer.
The reason for writing: I have just seen this most
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, 0:01:04, sam tygier wrote:
Some of those enhancements are incredible (in a literal sense of
the word). specifically the final MC Escher(esq) towers.
I found the eye chart the most incredible:
sam tygier (samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk) wrote:
If you look at the fences under the smaller arches, they have been
interpolated from nothing. does the algorithm somehow spot the similar
regions at other scales, and filled in the small arches with copies of
the big arches?
Apparently so:
Our
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-similarity
SR and Fattal are most effective when the image contains much of it,
and this is reflected in the choice of test images.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
