Robert L Krawitz wrote:
III) Things that we really should fix if we can, but that won't stop
the release.
2) Tune the 2880x720 Epson printers. It may be possible to get
slightly better print quality on those machines; if we can, that
would be mildly useful to a lot of
On 29 May 2001, at 12:22, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question: what parts of GIMP need their own license? I ask this,
because the GPL only covers the program and its components, AFAIK.
But what are its components supposed to be? I am talking mainly
On 4 Sep 2001, at 13:54, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should perhaps somebody else send this e-mail? I can imagine that a
mail coming from a gimp.org address would look more official. I
would be glad to give you my list of 'offending' scripts and
authors.
Am 03 Sep 2001 17:45:13 -0700 schrieb Brian Weber:
So if I understand you correctly, since the gimps main purpose is
to
perform bitwise manipulation that 64 bit won't give much of a benefit.
No, it's doing bytewise operation on 8, 16, 24 or 32bit data and it has
to because many processors
Am 04 Sep 2001 15:51:34 +0200 schrieb Sven Neumann:
you certainly can process several 8 bit channels in one operation without
special support from the processor and I would like to contribute such
code to The GIMP
Uii, now I'm curious. If you group an RGBA pixel together in a word and
want
