Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It may not seem to be a big deal, but every week there is at least one bug
report that I have to leave in the UNCONFIRMED state simply because I cannot
test it. So if nobody objects to the addition of a Bugzilla field in the
PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS
the idea was not to use the original drawable but to have the preview
create a scaled version of the selected area and expose it to the
plug-in as if it was a drawable. This will need some hacks in the
proxy drawable code in libgimp but I think it could be done.
Oh, ok. That's a good
On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
...they just stop leaving a forwarding e-mail address :)
Following on from the other plug-in discussion, can anyone tell
me what the procedure is for updating old plug-ins which were
added by someone who is now (apparrently)
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:55:58 -0400, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
Following on from the other plug-in discussion, can anyone tell
me what the procedure is for updating old plug-ins which were
added by someone who is now
Carol Spears wrote:
On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
There were
a couple of older plug-ins I used recently which needed a little
bit of updating to get them to work with 1.2, and I'd like to
update the originals on registry.gimp.org, but the author's
contact
On 2002-04-11 at 1718.41 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have been wanting to collect all of the working plug-ins and make them
available on my site. only plug-ins that are not already included with
GIMP, however.
if you have a
On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
Hi,
well, then the registry needs to be improved. Did you contact Ingo and
offered your help?
what could be so bad with a place to collect the updated plug-ins?
nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to look for
On 2002-04-11 at 1735.06 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
work is overstating it :) In fact I just found out about
ENABLE_GIMP_COMPAT_CRUFT, and essentially all I did was to make
a couple (psd_save and DigitalSignature) of 1.0 plug-ins compile
without it. It's basically
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:01:03 -0400, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to look for plug-ins.
i seem to remember from the discussion of the registry from this list
(way back
On 2002-04-11 at 1834.02 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this mail:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:01:03 -0400, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to look for plug-ins.
i seem to
10 matches
Mail list logo
