Hi,
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As it turns out 1.3 is in fact able to create a layer mask from the
alpha channel and then discarding the alpha channel by using alpha
treshold. So it _is_ possible to 'transfer' the channel to the mask ATM.
do you think we should add a simpler way
On 21 Mar 2003 10:23:23 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As it turns out 1.3 is in fact able to create a layer mask from the
alpha channel and then discarding the alpha channel by using alpha
treshold. So it _is_ possible to 'transfer' the
Hi,
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that discarding the alpha channel is not the appropriate
way to describe this operation. After using Threshold Alpha, you
still have an alpha channel with transparent and non-transparent
parts (all fully transparent parts are still
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 10:23, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As it turns out 1.3 is in fact able to create a layer mask from the
alpha channel and then discarding the alpha channel by using alpha
treshold. So it _is_ possible to 'transfer' the channel to
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 11:15, Raphal Quinet wrote:
I think that discarding the alpha channel is not the appropriate way
to describe this operation. After using Threshold Alpha, you still have
an alpha channel with transparent and non-transparent parts (all fully
transparent parts are still
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-03-21 at 0124.53 +0100):
Related to this, I would love to have a function that would enable me to
create a layer mask from alpha channel or apply it to the existing mask.
Is not that what I did in script-fu long time ago using 1.2? The only
problem I had is that
