On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:21:47PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
So the huge image you generated is a fractal? Isn't it a bit silly to
render such images (especially if they are huge) with GIMP, where all
of the image's pixels are kept in memory (or the tile cache) all the
time? Aren't many
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
I'd just like to say: Well done. I managed to create a A1 poster at 600
dpi - a whopping 1.1 Gig of picture data (about 2x14000 pixels).
Was there a real difference between 600 DPI and 300 DPI? I have
Hi,
Ben Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 10:03 pm, Simon Budig wrote:
Simply cvs update your local tree again. A broken pipe can happen and
is nothing to worry about. We can do nothing about that.
No, I meant that the broken pipe happened during the
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.=19
and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
The archive is
a) out of date (last message from July 26)
b) not searchable (ht://dig error: Unable to read configuration file)
Bye, Tino.
--
*
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze)
To: Gimp Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Mailing list archive out of date
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:54:47 +0200
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.=19
and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes:
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.=19
and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
They aren't publically announced but the URL appeared here earlier
(http://gimp.org/win32/gimp-head.zip).
The archive
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.=19
and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
They aren't publically announced but the URL appeared here earlier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-25 at 1354.47 +0200):
a) out of date (last message from July 26)
See Sven's post. Until the RAM issue is solved, try:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
http://news.gmane.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/
b) not searchable (ht://dig error: Unable to read configuration
Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:39:44PM +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure that ergonomy was considered for Photoshop when they
chose Ctrl-Shift-Z for Redo... I do think it's overstating our
importance somewhat to say that what's good for a large
Tino Schwarze writes:
You're right. If you could tell me such a program... I would have used
it. The nearest approximation was xfractint but it's cumbersome to use
and doesn't have a gradient editor (and I'm not sure whether it's
capable of rendering 2x14000 pixel images). ;-)
I believe we could hard-code two keybindings to work as the
default, couldn't we?
Technically possible, but extremely horrible, since the user has to be
educated about it. And since the only argument in favour of the less
ergonomic C-S-Z is easier to learn, that sounds even worse than leaving
it
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:08:02 +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the current situation, I think it's reasonable to fit in with
what others do in the general case, which dynamic shortcuts
provide a way to revert to the old behaviour. When the others are
everyone using a Mac, plus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-25 at 2008.02 +0200):
You have a point here. I think that what was chosen was the
consistency of Shift as negation. I think that's probably a goal
Relation, not just plain negation. So that is why using shift for
grouping would be fine.
we could work towards. It
Ok. let's see.
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arranging for the GIMP to be able to generate PDFs with text layers
as text is on my todo for 2.2 list.
To get that done in sane way, you'd have to use a PDF Pango backend.
There is such a beast but last I
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Tino Schwarze wrote:
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:54:47 +0200
From: Tino Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gimp Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Mailing list archive out of date
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for
I was thinking about a page with ressources for users who made
presentations about the GIMP. During my work on some presentation stuff
for the university, i thought, that it'll be usefull to get images
to demonstrate some atools.
But ... after thinking about this, i don't know if this idea is
On 25 Sep 2003, at 23:50, Roman Joost wrote:
I was thinking about a page with ressources for users who made
presentations about the GIMP. During my work on some presentation
stuff for the university, i thought, that it'll be usefull to get
images to demonstrate some atools.
But ... after
The wiki should be very handy for holding things and sharing things
until we get the registry problems ironed out and figure out how the new
web site will work.
carol
Roman Joost wrote:
I was thinking about a page with ressources for users who made
presentations about the GIMP. During my work
18 matches
Mail list logo
