[Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-21 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:34:34AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 00:11, Carol Spears wrote: What qualifies you to represent The GIMP? excuse me, my last reply was fairly rude. this is what qualifies me to represent TheGIMP. i latched onto a project with a poor

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-21 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 08:24, Carol Spears wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:34:34AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 00:11, Carol Spears wrote: What qualifies you to represent The GIMP? excuse me, my last reply was fairly rude. this is what qualifies me to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Let me clarify a bit. Carol Spears wrote: to find out that 1) the trip was funded and 2) dsrogers went without a plan of what he would say or do there. i am simply unable to explain more than this. When I heard about the comdex thing, I assumed that there was finding from O'Reilly. The fact

Re: [Gimp-developer] COMDEX debrief

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Daniel, thanks for what you are doing in Vegas. I was surprised when I heard that you offered to go there even though it looked like there would be no financial support whatsoever. Nice that it turned out that you won't have to pay everything yourself. I am certain you are doing a good job

Re: [Gimp-developer] COMDEX debrief

2003-11-21 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 12:46, Sven Neumann wrote: thanks for what you are doing in Vegas. I was surprised when I heard that you offered to go there even though it looked like there would be no financial support whatsoever. Nice that it turned out that you won't have to pay everything

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: FSF Europe, ORA, FlamingText GIMP and someone else I can't remember gave us money for the last conference, of which 400 euros remains. Apple also lent us some equipment. Please let me get things straight on the fundings for the GIMP Developers Conference this

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Raphaƫl Quinet
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:00:51 +0100, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1) GUADEC 2) Lyon 3) London 4) Dublin 5) Chemnitz Are there others? We need volunteers. I could

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: Gimp-Print 4.3.24

2003-11-21 Thread Robert L Krawitz
NOTE: This is planned to be the last development release prior to alpha for the next stable line, and it contains a number of major enhancements. Please test this thoroughly! Gimp-Print 4.3.24, released November 21, 2003, is a development release of this package. Like all development releases,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Am 20.11.03, 21:10 -0800 schrieb Daniel Rogers: I am working on an api for this in GEGL. It is probably best to use the system api's, when available, since there are already methods to plug lcms into the exisiting system api's (on windows and Mac OS X) as a CMM. This would be fine for unix

[Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1) GUADEC 2) Lyon 3) London 4) Dublin 5) Chemnitz Are there others? We

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 12:00, David Neary wrote: I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. Good idea. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1)

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi Henrik, thanks for the feedback. Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: LOCATION Personally I think it would be best to piggy-back on an existing event given that the organizers wouldn't mind, of course. This would give us the benefit of an existing infrastructure. In this case, what IT events

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi Andrew, Andrew Langdon-Davies wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:00:51 +0100, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOCATION snip Are there others? We need volunteers. Barcelona, Catalonia (near Spain)? Site of the Universal Forum of Cultures 2004, and probably also of an alternative forum

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Branko Collin
On 21 Nov 2003, at 12:00, David Neary wrote: I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I consider important) back on track. LOCATION So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development, each of which has some + points and some - points. 1) GUADEC 2) Lyon 3)

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In this case, what IT events do people know of in the timescale we're looking at? GUADEC obviously fits, the Chemnitz event is a little early for my tastes, but is certainly an option. What other events are there that people know about? Well, there

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote: | Am 20.11.03, 21:10 -0800 schrieb Daniel Rogers: | | |I am working on an api for this in GEGL. It is probably best to use the |system api's, when available, since there are already methods to plug |lcms into the exisiting

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kai-Uwe Behrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know someone allready working on this? X11 has support for color management for a lng time already. What

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
David Neary wrote: Also, I think local LUGs and any GUG's should be invovled with our gimpcon. It would be a great place for user-developer exchange. And a great place to teach everyone more about using the gimp. This might increase your number estimates. FACILITIES What facilities do we

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kai-Uwe Behrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have gimps configure an header check for lcms allready onboard? This would help plug-ins to easily link against liblcms? I don't see how a configure check in GIMP would help plug-ins so the answer to the question doesn't really matter. I'll give

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi, Branko Collin wrote: Sven suggested (IIRC), Hacking Extreme http://www.hex2005.org, the follow-up event to Hackers At Large in 2001, but that is of course still more than one and a half year away. The advantage, from what I understood, and IIRC, was that it tied into a networked

[Gimp-developer] Re: Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread GSR - FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-21 at 0834.36 +0100): This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know someone allready working on this? apropos Xcms should give you some man pages, here it does. If one checks the

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread David Neary
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: I expect that 2004 will see another Hackmeeting but the webpage doesn't mention a date nor a place yet: http://www.hackmeeting.org/2003/history_en Perhaps someone knows more about the plans for 2004. I heard a lot of good things about past Hackmeetings and it would

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Daniel Rogers
GSR - FR wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-21 at 0834.36 +0100): This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know someone allready working on this? apropos Xcms should give you some man pages, here it does. If