Hi,
Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did build the latest libwmf (2.8.1). It required some minor patches
to its source. But it's not installation-location-independent (like
for instance GTK and GIMP are). It looks for its fonts in a I location
fixed at build time. This is not
Hi,
While GIMP is approaching the 2.0 release, the libgimp* APIs are
stabilizing and it's about time to update plug-ins so they will work
with GIMP-2.0. In order to help you with this effort and to encourage
you to write some fancy new plug-ins, here's a new release of the
GIMP Plug-In Template:
Hi,
here are some links to discussion about the GIMP user interface and
how Inkscape could benefit from it:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3546965forum_id=36054
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3546964forum_id=36054
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
| Tor Lillqvist writes:
| Possibly the lcms.dll in the lcms11.zip file isn't suitable as such
| to be used from GIMP, but will have to be rebuilt from source.
|
| Yes, that seems to be the case. I don't know the technical
Other effects aside, I am all for preserving the RGB values of each
pixel, regardless of it's alpha value. If there is garbage in there,
once the mask has the alpha channel, it can be selected by color
and one can cut away the previously transparent areas quite easily.
Also, the nominations copy
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While GIMP is approaching the 2.0 release, the libgimp* APIs are
stabilizing and it's about time to update plug-ins so they will work
with GIMP-2.0
as gimp packager in mandrake linux distribution, there's one thing
that has always annoy me with the way
hiya, thanks for responding,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:54:12PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
are there other instances of tools that do not appear in either the
menus or in the toolbox?
No. All tools register a menu entry at least. A few of them set a
On Monday 01 December 2003 19:00, David Neary wrote:
(...)
And Alpha channel to Layer Mask is unclear?
If there is an action of copy alpha to mask and one other of move
alpha to mask, then alpha to mask, IMO, is not clear.
Actually I dislike the way they are spelled right now
(/me run
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Other effects aside, I am all for preserving the RGB values of each
pixel, regardless of it's alpha value. If there is garbage in there,
once the mask has the alpha channel
Agreed. I am of the opinion that modifying the alpha channel
should never modify RGB data. If we
Tor Lillqvist writes:
I did build the latest libwmf (2.8.1). It required some minor patches
to its source. But it's not installation-location-independent (like
for instance GTK and GIMP are). It looks for its fonts in a I location
fixed at build time. This is not acceptable on Windows. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
