Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made a few improvements. I've posted them at http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogSimple.png and http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogExpanded.png Sorry, but I fail to see

RE: [Gimp-developer] new file-new dialog

2004-05-07 Thread Austin Donnelly
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Add an easy way to change the image's unit. It's quite well hidden in the Image Scale dialog right now. With the changes proposed above, changing the image unit could become a more frequent task, so it should be easily accessible.

[Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Branko Collin
I just got rebuked by Sven for reporting bugs that are strictly related to Jernej Simoncic's MS Windows builds of the GIMP. Apparently, Bugzilla is only there for reporting bugs on the stuff that WGO distributes. In a way, that definitely makes sense. However, anyone who uses a pre-compiled

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Gimp on Slashdot

2004-05-07 Thread Simon Budig
Juhana Sadeharju ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: But maybe they are not that easy to code? Adding a vector layer to the images should be easy if the image object is good, but the vector manipulations can be difficult. Typically each plugin has its own kludge way to manipulate vector objects

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Branko Collin wrote: However, anyone who uses a pre-compiled build cannot know beforehand what part of the bugs are build related, and what part GIMP related. Especially MS Windows users, who may not (and should not!) have a concept of build versus source distribution to begin with, may

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Simon Budig
Dave Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jernej's installers are a great service, and if we don't want him to stop (and I know I don't), and bit more tolerance is called for. Currently, we don't even tell people how they should report bugs against the installer, the bugs are just closed

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being scared away by curt WONTFIX replies. The reply is NOTGNOME and we usually ask the bug reporter to get in

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Simon Budig wrote: What about a component installers or binary packages where we can put the bugs that are related to a certain gimp distribution? Sure, I could do this. I'll wait to see what the feedback on this thread is first. Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being scared away by curt WONTFIX replies. The reply is NOTGNOME and we usually ask the bug reporter

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: By we, you mean I, don't you? And today that hasn't happened at least once, the reply was simply Your bug report is about the installer then and thus does not belong into this bug-tracker. Well, I knew that I was dealing with Branko, who should know

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Branko Collin
On 7 May 2004, at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote: Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: By we, you mean I, don't you? And today that hasn't happened at least once, the reply was simply Your bug report is about the installer then and thus does not belong into this bug-tracker. Well, I knew

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Michael Schumacher
Dave Neary wrote: Sven Neumann wrote: Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being scared away by curt WONTFIX replies. The reply is NOTGNOME and we

[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 17:50:13, Sven Neumann wrote: Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify the project for also using the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread David Neary
Hi Jernej, Jernej Simon?i? wrote: Not sure about what kind of proprietary scripts are you talking about - the installer scripts were always available... I'm glad you joined the thread, because there's one question that hasn't been answered yet. Would you like to have your installer's problems

[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 20:59:14, David Neary wrote: I'm glad you joined the thread, because there's one question that hasn't been answered yet. I've been subscribed for a while, but haven't really posted much (and I just noticed that the last 2 messages I did send never arrived to the list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, =?Windows-1250?Q?Jernej_Simon=E8i=E8?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify the project

[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 22:59:14, Sven Neumann wrote: I was under the impression that building a GIMP installer involved some black magic. After all there don't seem to be many people able to build GIMP from source on win32. Once you have the mingw+MSys environment set up, building Gimp is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Donation for GIMP features

2004-05-07 Thread J. Grant
Hi Michael, You might want to have a look at XNest, or the following GIMP plug-in if you are working on Win32: http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=3892 I don't know if there is an equivalent for Mac OS X, though. Thanks for the link. This is great, it's got a lot of what I was interested in. If

[Gimp-developer] Cleaning up the wiki

2004-05-07 Thread Michael Schumacher
Hi, as you might (or might not) have noticed, the wiki at http://wiki.gimp.org is becoming a really useful resource for The GIMP. There are, however, a few problems that should be looked at. In short words, these are look, content and configuration. Look The wiki just doesn't look like a

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jernej's installers are a great service, and if we don't want him to stop (and I know I don't), and bit more tolerance is called for. Currently, we don't even tell people how they should report bugs against

Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

2004-05-07 Thread Nathan Carl Summers
On 7 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made a few improvements. I've posted them at http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogSimple.png and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

2004-05-07 Thread Øyvind Kolås
* Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040508 03:31]: On 7 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made a few improvements. I've posted them at