1) When the jpeg loader finds EXIF data, it creates a parasite
called jpeg-exif-data. EXIF data is not specific to jpeg files,
though, and having differently named parasites for tiff-exif-data,
etc, makes things unnecessarily difficult, as far as I can see. Can
this be renamed as simply
Could somebody kick the webserver? http://wiki.gimp.org and
http://www.gimp.org seem to be down. Ping and tracert seem to be able
to reach www.gimp.org, but my webbrowser seems to say 'no go'.
--
branko collin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-developer
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) When the jpeg loader finds EXIF data, it creates a parasite
called jpeg-exif-data. EXIF data is not specific to jpeg files,
though, and having differently named parasites for tiff-exif-data,
etc, makes things unnecessarily difficult, as far as
Could somebody kick the webserver? http://wiki.gimp.org and
http://www.gimp.org seem to be down. Ping and tracert seem to be able
to reach www.gimp.org, but my webbrowser seems to say 'no go'.
Both work for me.
_
Stay in touch with
From: Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how this could be useful in an image manipulation context.
If implemented for a program primarily intended for vector stuff
(Skencil, Sodipodi) this might be very helpful, but in GIMP the primary
goal for now is to create pixel based images - which
Hi,
Earlier on in the week I asked if someone would volunteer to add
some information to the website, and unfortunately to date that
hasn't happened.
I would do it myself, if I had the time. But I won't have the
time until the week after next, probably. And then we'll be under
5 weeks from
