hi,
i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
to be interesting and revealing:
http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png
can something be done to make stroking be at least as nice as it used to
be?
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
to be interesting and revealing:
http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png
Well, the image alone doesn't
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
to be interesting and revealing:
http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png
Interesting. I always assumed that the
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:48:13PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
to be interesting and revealing:
Hi,
Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would help the stroking would be an automatic conversion of the
outline to a path and then stroking this. We cannot do this right now
since the selection to path functionality is implemented as a plugin and
the core must not depend on a plugin.
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the upper circles were stroked with the default setting of the current
stroke dialog. the lower circles were stroked with the fuzzy 7 pixel
brush. the stroking with gimp-1.2 did not have a default stroke option
like one finds in gimp2 so it is a
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:21:42PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the upper circles were stroked with the default setting of the current
stroke dialog. the lower circles were stroked with the fuzzy 7 pixel
brush. the stroking with gimp-1.2 did
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot reproduce your brush-stroking result for gimp-2.0 then. Is
that a recent version of gimp-2.0 that you've been using? Does it
contain the fix for bug #147836?
i am using gimp-2.0 from debian.
is there a reason that it would be fixed
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 08:35:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot reproduce your brush-stroking result for gimp-2.0 then. Is
that a recent version of gimp-2.0 that you've been using? Does it
contain the fix for bug #147836?
i am
Sven Neumann wrote:
My guess is that you used a
different brush when creating the stroke with gimp-2.0.
The top two look like they were stroked with a square
brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
recipe for what transpired...
--Adam
Adam D. Moss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
My guess is that you used a
different brush when creating the stroke with gimp-2.0.
The top two look like they were stroked with a square
brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
recipe for what transpired...
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
well, due to the many concerns about how i made these images, there is
now a whole series of pngs/xcfs in this same directory, ending with:
http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke4.png where the same selection is used
in all three gimp versions.
the
Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The top two look like they were stroked with a square
brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
recipe for what transpired...
The top two are the result of stroking the selection outline using
libart. The strange outcome is because
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:26:12PM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
Actually I tried to explain to carol that the in some 2.0 version the
brush used for stroking is not always the same that is selected in the
brush dialog. Looking at stroke4.png does not
Hi,
Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually I tried to explain to carol that the in some 2.0 version the
brush used for stroking is not always the same that is selected in the
brush dialog. Looking at stroke4.png does not convince me that carol
really used the brush the thought was
15 matches
Mail list logo