Hi,
elf said:
I want to know if I can write this plug-in in the context of Summer of Code?
Please make a proposal based on this idea via the SoC interface - it
seems a little light to me for a 3 month project, but perhaps the other
developers will see things differently.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave
elf wrote:
This link is about my idea: http://gimp.mrtech.ru/
There is short article. But if you are interested in I can show all
mathemetic calculations, graphics and other materials I have.
Your application submitted in the Google SoC web interface should
definitely contain links to this
On 5/7/06, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
elf wrote:
Well, today is 7 may and for registration I have only 1 day. So, I
would like to know answer for my question: if I can develop this
module in the context Summer of Code?
Right now, my answer would be no. This looks like yet
I'm considering creating a new brush system for the GIMP as part of the
Summer of Code in order to make GIMP more suitable to digital painting.
I've made some contributions to the project before, but it has been a
while. Can anyone comment on how extensive changes to the rest of the
codebase would
Philip L. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm considering creating a new brush system for the GIMP as part of the
Summer of Code in order to make GIMP more suitable to digital painting.
I've made some contributions to the project before, but it has been a
while. Can anyone comment on how extensive
I'm considering creating a new brush system for the GIMP as part of the
Summer of Code in order to make GIMP more suitable to digital painting.
Adding new painting tools that use a different type of brush is
definitely a realistic project for somebody with your knowledge and
abilities (as I
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-05-07 at 1520.30 -0700):
I'm considering creating a new brush system for the GIMP as part of the
Summer of Code in order to make GIMP more suitable to digital painting.
Adding new painting tools that use a different type of brush is
definitely a realistic project
New tools? Why not improving the basic brush system (sometimes with
artificial limits, see animated brushes workflow or pixmap scaling)
and let all tools make use of it? Erase, airbrush and so on...
To refresh people's memory, Philip is the person who wrote
the code that lets the transform
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-05-07 at 1754.05 -0700):
New tools? Why not improving the basic brush system (sometimes with
artificial limits, see animated brushes workflow or pixmap scaling)
and let all tools make use of it? Erase, airbrush and so on...
To refresh people's memory, Philip is
GSR - FR wrote:
I am just pointing that new tools sound silly, when a more general brush
system seems the solution. Take ink tool, I think it could have been done
by just set the brush tip to react to things like speed and angle,
The ink tool is actually a good example, because it works in
Simon Budig wrote:
It is not exactly clear to me what you mean by how extensive changes to
the rest of the codebase would need to be - this seems to me to be very
much up to you and your ideas for the brush system enhancements.
Specifically, what caused me to ask that was the problem of
11 matches
Mail list logo
