Hi,
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:07 -0700, Saul Goode wrote:
I am unaware of any PDB function that would permit and would be
interested in any input as to how this might be accomplished --
including which code in the core I might avail if I were to create such
a PDB function.
The undo
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:54 +1000, Williams, Andrew wrote:
With some difficulty I built Gimp 2.3.7 with Python using MinGW on Win
XP. Make and make install completed without error.
Why would you waste your time building such an outdated version of GIMP
2.3?
Sven
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 00:16 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
someone could review the strings that
Hi,
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On 05.10.2006 07:54, Williams, Andrew wrote:
With some difficulty I built Gimp 2.3.7 with Python using MinGW on Win
XP. Make and make install completed without error.
Gimp starts, but there is no Python in the Toolbars/Xtns menu (or any
others); Script explorer shows NO python scrips.
You
On 10/5/06, Sven Neumann wrote:
In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
someone could review the strings that have been marked for translation.
I would like to point translators to the new
On Thursday, October 5, 2006, 8:32:46, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 05.10.2006 07:54, Williams, Andrew wrote:
With some difficulty I built Gimp 2.3.7 with Python using MinGW on Win
XP. Make and make install completed without error.
Gimp starts, but there is no Python in the Toolbars/Xtns menu (or
Since last week, Tiny-Fu is able to run many of the old Script-Fu
scripts unmodified: it reads files with the *.scm extension and uses
the script-fu-* namespace so that it can process the calls to
script-fu-register.
I tested Tiny-Fu with several third-party scripts or scripts that are
not in the
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon?
I have submitted a patch which hopefully will be close to what you are
expecting.
It is amazing what
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:10 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
From my point of view, Tiny-Fu is now ready to replace Script-Fu and I
would like to encourage everybody to make the switch so that we can
fix any remaining bugs. Considering that Tiny-Fu solves some real
problems (i18n), the
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:36 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Does reviewing mean that someone goes through scripts, marks forgotten
messages and err... unmarks those that should not be translated?
Sure, I might have forgotten a message or two. But the main point of
such a review is that
Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow
that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be
possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu
explicitely, but otherwise Script-Fu should be considered as obsolete.
I should like to
12 matches
Mail list logo