Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 01:43 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I'm using 2.3.18 and I noticed that if I apply the autocrop layer
function twice, it crops the entire image to the layer dimensions.
It's like if you apply autocrop layer on a layer that has been cropped
it acts like the
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:59:08AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:01 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and immediately
saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the Save as... dialog, there is
no option to save (or not) the
Hi,
A user pointed out at a little annoyance in Curves tool that I've
learn't not to care about: deleting a node by selecting it and
pressing Delete doesn't work.
I see consistent behavior between dragging node to border to remove it
and dragging a guide to border to remove it, but could we
Hi,
just doing a fresh config of mouse scroll and I note a few changes that
are worth a comment.
1/ I set up mouse scroll to zoom in and out and exited. I get the
following helpful msg:
You will have to restart GIMP for the following changes to take effect:
temp-path
swap-path
The
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:58 +0100, Alex Pounds wrote:
There has never been such an option in the Save as... dialog.
My copy of the Gimp disagrees with you on this point:
http://www.ethicsgirls.com/stuff/exifshot.jpg
That's not the Save As dialog which would be the file-chooser you
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:57:43 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here no error is shown. It ends with this output:
make[2]: Entering directory `/svn/gimp'
test -z /opt/gimp/bin || mkdir -p -- /opt/gimp/bin
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 11:03 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
I see consistent behavior between dragging node to border to remove it
and dragging a guide to border to remove it, but could we possibly
make Delete button work too?
That can be easily arranged. We would accept a patch for
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ I set up mouse scroll to zoom in and out and exited. I get the
following helpful msg:
You will have to restart GIMP for the following changes to take effect:
temp-path
swap-path
That's a bug in the preferences dialog
Hi,
I just noticed a little warning has been added to interpolation dlg. Nice
touch, it's important.
Indexed colour layers are always scaled without interpolation. The chosen
interpolation type will affect channels and masks only.
I'm concerned this text is far too technical for most users
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:33:15 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ I set up mouse scroll to zoom in and out and exited. I get the
following helpful msg:
You will have to restart GIMP for the following changes to
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed it may be best if this only gets shown when relevant. If there are
no indexed layers present (which will often be the case) it is irrelevant
and just slows the user by feeding him unneeded info to parse.
It is very
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:58:17 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed it may be best if this only gets shown when relevant. If there
are
no indexed layers present (which will often be the case) it is
irrelevant
Hi,
I tried to compile the latest GIMP version from the SVN trunk. My
problem: the ./configure script (called from autogen.sh) doesn't
recognize libexif although the libexif-dev and libexif-gtk-dev
packages are installed and the headers and libs are indeed present:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ ls
Hi Richard
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:21:47AM +, Richard Hirner wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile the latest GIMP version from the SVN trunk. My
problem: the ./configure script (called from autogen.sh) doesn't
recognize libexif although the libexif-dev and libexif-gtk-dev
packages are
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:54:57PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
You need at least libexif 0.6.15.
Ok thanks, that solves the problem. I have libexif 0.6.13 which is
shipped with Ubuntu 7.04.
--
Richard
www.gimpusers.com
___
Gimp-developer
Von: Mukund Sivaraman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need at least libexif 0.6.15.
The summary should indicate this - use too old rather than not found.
Michael
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
Mukund Sivaraman muks at mukund.org writes:
I also think she's genuinely insane and needs to seek medical attention
(seriously). She may not be doing all of this on purpose for fun, but
maybe because she has mental issues.
Having been a target of one of her episodes in 2004 myself, I went at
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:51:50 + (UTC), Daniel Pisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mukund Sivaraman muks at mukund.org writes:
If there are anyone who know her personally and are nearby, please get
her medical attention.
Yes, please. Her condition is serious.
You both raised several valid
Hi Raphael
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:51:50 + (UTC), Daniel Pisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mukund Sivaraman muks at mukund.org writes:
If there are anyone who know her personally and are nearby, please get
her medical attention.
Yes, please. Her condition is serious.
Raphaël Quinet raphael at gimp.org writes:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:51:50 + (UTC), Daniel Pisano docpi at
web.de wrote:
Mukund Sivaraman muks at mukund.org writes:
If there are anyone who know her personally and are nearby, please get
her medical attention.
Yes, please. Her
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:29:15PM +, Daniel Pisano wrote:
Hence my motivation to speak out in this thread. And I have no more to
say about this matter, since all that I could do, I have done.
I haven't read all the postings in this thread yet, as this week is busy
for me, but I have to say
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to
cover the case where an indexed layer was added. The basic point is that
this message is great if there is an indexed element in the image,
otherwise
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:31 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Mukund Sivaraman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need at least libexif 0.6.15.
The summary should indicate this - use too old rather than not found.
It could do that. But there is already informative output when the test
for
On Tuesday, June 19, 2007, 9:01:46, Sven Neumann wrote:
I don't know if everyone of the GIMP development team is as annoyed of
Carol as I am, but I know that there are quite a few people who are.
I personally haven't had much interaction with Carol, but that was
because I saw her behaviour
2007/6/21, Mukund Sivaraman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Raphael
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:51:50 + (UTC), Daniel Pisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mukund Sivaraman muks at mukund.org writes:
If there are anyone who know her personally and are nearby, please get
her medical
Hi Louis
Louis Desjardins wrote:
I did not intend to offend anybody here. If I did, I apologize in advance.
You do not offend. You probably wrote this email with the best
intentions, but you seem unaware of many things that have happened.
I cannot discuss the reasons of each and everyone
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:13:42 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to
cover the case where an indexed layer was added. The basic point is that
this
peter sikking wrote:
We do imagine that a set of website graphics pieces gets _produced_
on a single canvas, and when everything works well together
graphically, with a single 'cutting mask' all pieces are cut out
and saved in the right web format, in a single action.
I don't see how this
I have a Panasonic FZ50 whose EXIF data was always preserved by
GIMP. Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and
immediately saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the Save as...
dialog, there is no option to save (or not) the EXIF, as it always
was. Not evey a grey
On 6/22/07, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Thanks for (yet another) (double) stupid answer, Sven.
offtopic
We are not going to compensate loss of Carol by become rude ourselves
are we? Could we possibly take a deep breath, count to 10 and smile
friendlier to each other?
/offtopic
Alexandre
Hi Mukund,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Here is the bug in question:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stated by the
Hi Mukund,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Here is the bug in question:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stated by
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:25 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version = 2.3.18)
needs libexif = 0.6.15, while there is no RPM repository
with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
based distros have the libexif outdated).
[...]
Same
On 6/22/07, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Thanks for (yet another) (double) stupid answer, Sven.
offtopic
We are not going to compensate loss of Carol by become rude
ourselves are we? Could we possibly take a deep breath,
count to 10 and smile friendlier to each other?
/offtopic
Alexandre
Of
34 matches
Mail list logo
