Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:38 +0200, Geert Jordaens wrote:
What are your doubts with the new code? Why would a simple box-filter be
better for decimating?
My doubts with the current approach are manifold:
The current code has decimation routines, but they are only suited for
the
Hi,
I also started to play with some enhancements on top of the patch we are
discussing here. Using a steep gaussian filter instead of the plain box
filter seems to be a good compromise. It's better at suppressing Moire
patterns, at the cost of introducing a little blur. I have not yet
finished
Hi
Sven Neumann wrote:
As already explained in my previous mail, the decimation routines are
only used for the pre-scaling steps. As soon as the image is close
enough to the final size, the chosen interpolation routine is used. This
gives continuous results for all scale factors as there is
Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
Hi
Sven Neumann wrote:
As already explained in my previous mail, the decimation routines are
only used for the pre-scaling steps. As soon as the image is close
enough to the final size, the chosen interpolation routine is used. This
gives continuous results
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:38 +0200, Geert Jordaens wrote:
What are your doubts with the new code? Why would a simple box-filter be
better for decimating?
My doubts with the current approach are manifold:
The current code has decimation routines, but
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 14:15 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I also started to play with some enhancements on top of the patch we are
discussing here. Using a steep gaussian filter instead of the plain box
filter seems to be a good compromise. It's better at suppressing Moire
patterns, at the
Hi,
I noticed that there was a lack of splashes for 2.6 so I made one for an
option. Here it is for your appraisal: http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash2.png
Best,
Alexia
PS: This is a photo manipulation, not a painting. The base image is a photo of
a sand sculpture altered with some processing
After an idea on IRC (thanks Martin!) the text on it got reworked into this:
http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash3.png that seems better.
On Friday 29 August 2008 23:26:57 Alexia Death wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that there was a lack of splashes for 2.6 so I made one for an
option. Here it is for
2008/8/29 Alexia Death [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After an idea on IRC (thanks Martin!) the text on it got reworked into this:
http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash3.png that seems better.
That looks really nice! One thing I suggest is to make the GIMP logo a
bit brighter, I don't think it stands out quite