Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 18:15 +0200, Stephan Hegel wrote:
Gimp-2.6 throws a segfault for me.
It would help a lot if you could file a bug report for this. Thanks.
You're welcome: #554966.
Rgds,
Stephan.
___
Gimp-developer
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
gui?
If you have the GIMP Animation Package installed, you will find a plug-in
named 'plug-in-wr-curves' which permits
Hi Kent,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
gui?
If you have the GIMP Animation
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
gui?
If you have the GIMP Animation Package installed, you will find a plug-in
named 'plug-in-wr-curves' which permits
Tobias, I apologize for replying to your personal address. Here's to the
list.
IMHO it is just a waste of space because it is not a good indicator for
a drop target. Not one of the ppl I showed it - all of them designers -
recognized it as a drop target and, frankly, the image in there is
simply
I also think that the toolbox Wilber is an inefficient use of space, so
here is an idea (my apologies if this has already been discussed/thought
of): Right now there are 3 status items in
Preferences-Toolbox-Appearance, that when checked appear below the
toolbox tool icons. Add a 4th status
Hi,
if you don't like it, or it doesn't fit your screen layout, then why
don't you just turn it off? There's a gimprc option for this and it is
documented. There is no UI for it, but that should be OK. There are
quite a few options that don't have a UI, simply because they are not
considered
, no?
He is there, to indicate that the toolbox is an drop area
for images.
Like the Wilbert in the empty window.
Regards,
Tobias
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/lists/gimp-developer/attachments/20081004/e7adcba2/attachment-0001.html
Hi,
if you don't like it, or it doesn't fit your screen layout, then why
don't you just turn it off? There's a gimprc option for this and it is
documented.
I thought this wasn't going to be done at all in 2.6, and the previous
part of this thread also made me think it still wasn't possible.
Hi,
I've just been playing a bit with 2.6, and have a request.
When the last image is closed, the no-image-open window snaps back to
whatever size it was before the first image was opened - which is great.
Could we take that further and make it snap back to its previous
position, as well
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
if you don't like it, or it doesn't fit your screen layout, then why
don't you just turn it off? There's a gimprc option for this and it is
documented.
Is it documented anywhere other than the gimprc file itself (and now
this mailing list too!)? In other words, is
Thanks for the info regarding this gimprc option. I disagree that the
Appearance section of Preferences-Toolbox is cluttered, given that
there are only 3 items there. If I were to write a patch and send it to
you, to add the (toobox-wilber [yes|no]) gimprc option to that section
of
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 14:04 -0500, William Steidtmann wrote:
Thanks for the info regarding this gimprc option. I disagree that the
Appearance section of Preferences-Toolbox is cluttered, given that
there are only 3 items there. If I were to write a patch and send it to
you, to add
Hi,
don't you guys get it? We want that graphics to stay and we don't want
to allow users to turn it off. The UI team decided that it is important
and thus it will stay. The only reason that I added a gimprc option to
disable it was because the graphics doesn't play nicely with a
horizontal
for the interrested http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555033
As stated by Sven Neumann that a bug report on this issue might be the
wrong attemption to clear this issue I'll try my luck with this list.
As written in the bug report, 555033, gimp tries to allocate more memory
than it
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
don't you guys get it?
I get it - I'm just disappointed by it.
I shall refrain from beating the dead horse any further.
All the best,
--
Alastair M. Robinson
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
gui?
If you have the GIMP Animation Package
On Sunday 05 October 2008, fremobit wrote:
In my opinion the needed memory for an image of the dimensions 15000px
to 15000px at 8bit depth is 214,57MB but Gimp allocates 1,1 GB.
This is an old discussion, but your case seems simpler than the usual
discussion/guesses: 8 bit means 8 bit per
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 00:29 +0200, fremobit wrote:
In my opinion the needed memory for an image of the dimensions 15000px
to 15000px at 8bit depth is 214,57MB but Gimp allocates 1,1 GB.
GIMP is not an image viewer, it is an image editor. As such it needs to
allocate not only the memory
for images.
Like the Wilbert in the empty window.
Regards,
Tobias
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/lists/gimp-developer/attachments/20081004/e7adcba2/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 04
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:15 PM, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/lists/gimp-developer/attachments/20081004/e7adcba2/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:57:28 -0500
From: William Steidtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] The toolbox
22 matches
Mail list logo