Hi,
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 18:27 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
first, Copy visible as new image could easily turn out too smart,
but since the bottom Background layer prefers to be one without alpha,
I can see something like: when ‘visible’ has effectively universal
full opacity, then omit
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 21:48 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Speaking of which (and sorry for interrupting the thread), could
somebody please fix Qmask message showing up in localized GIMP
instead of Quick mask translation when you toggle quick mask with
Shift+Q?
Where does this
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 16:03 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
no, squeezing these export options in the save dialog is not possible.
I think there is a misunderstanding here. What people suggested is not
to put the export options into the Save file-chooser but into the dialog
that the save
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:15 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Not all save plug-ins do this, but for
those that do it seems to make a lot of choice to integrate the export
questions there.
That was supposed to read ... it seems to make a lot of sense
Sven
Hi,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574418 now has a patch that
implements this change.
- blinking the channels/selections dialog: good
- showing the channels/selections dialog as the top: rather not
- making in the channels dialog case the new selection/channel the
the
This is sumit .
I am ineterested to apply for Gsoc 2009 - the gimp org.In the ideas of Gsoc
2008 there was a idea of implementing brushes that could be scaled up in a
lossless way using svg files as brushes.I have the code of gimp 2.64 .So i
need help to know what to start with. I will be very
Sven wrote:
what I first of all think is that the channels dialog needs to be
split in two: a channels dialog and a stored-selections dialog.
Having them in one dialog is admittedly somewhat confusing, but it
is an
established standard for pixel manipulation programs.
this may look to
Sven wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 16:03 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
no, squeezing these export options in the save dialog is not
possible.
I think there is a misunderstanding here.
OK, I looked to much at that attached mock-up.
What people suggested is not
to put the export options
Hi,
first of all, the application is called GNU Image Manipulation Program,
or short GIMP, but not The Gimp. Please try to keep that in mind.
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 18:56 +0530, sumith pandilwar wrote:
I am ineterested to apply for Gsoc 2009 - the gimp org.In the ideas of
Gsoc 2008 there was a
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:38 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
this may look to you like we are only shuffling the furniture,
but I cannot overstate how much this change is needed in the interest
of usability:
really. I am not exaggerating.
a significant portion of our core user group
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 18:27 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
first, Copy visible as new image could easily turn
out too smart,
but since the bottom Background layer prefers to be
one without alpha,
The first basic assumption is wrong...so maybe what build on that need
reconsideration
A
yahvuu wrote:
what an inspiring post.
peter sikking schrieb:
I must also point out that this save + export change is also a
change in attitude for GIMP. it clearly supports that our high-end
users work in no-loss xcf all the time (if they want to store
results) and that also means avoiding
Sven wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:38 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
this may look to you like we are only shuffling the furniture,
but I cannot overstate how much this change is needed in the interest
of usability:
really. I am not exaggerating.
a significant portion of our core user
Hi, I wasn't sure who to contact, so I joined this list in the hopes I could
reach some developers.
I'll try to keep this succinct.
I recently switched to Ubuntu and Gimp with great excitement, finally free of
Satan's Empire! But my happiness was short lived because it turns out my
ability to
Hi.
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 17:15 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
hmmm, there must be a misunderstanding here.
Yes, obviously there is. But it is on your side.
if you read carefully what I am proposing then you'll see that
the only thing that is going to change about the channels
dialog itself
Hi, I wasn't sure who to contact, so I joined this list in the hopes I
could reach some developers.
I'll try to keep this succinct.
I recently switched to Ubuntu and Gimp with great excitement, finally
free of Satan's Empire! But my happiness was short lived because it
turns out my ability
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:30 -0700, joff roepcke wrote:
I do simple graphic design- mostly ads for local businesses- usually
with text. In order to play with a body of text, changing fonts and
sizes, etc, you have to have a text box... hitting enter might work
for one line, but formatting
Sven wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 17:15 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
hmmm, there must be a misunderstanding here.
Yes, obviously there is. But it is on your side.
if you read carefully what I am proposing then you'll see that
the only thing that is going to change about the channels
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 21:05 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
and I can't believe that proposing an alignment of GIMP UI with
the realities of users expectations meets such a dogged resistance.
There is no dogged resistance. I just had the impression that you
believed that storing selections
peter sikking wrote:
Liam wrote:
I had a careful look at this:
My own workflow for www.fromoldbooks.org tends to be,
1. scan image with xsane plugin
2. crop if needed
3. save as 306-svens-ankles-raw.png
4. either quit after doing several of these, or continue with one...
5. use levels,
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, gg g...@catking.net wrote:
there is a problem with this new attitude. Why does GIMP try to impose
this you will work with xcf or die dictate?
Because it has always been an XCF editor, not an anything else editor.
Being able to modify images loaded from
David Gowers wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, gg g...@catking.net wrote:
there is a problem with this new attitude. Why does GIMP try to impose
this you will work with xcf or die dictate?
Because it has always been an XCF editor, not an anything else editor.
Being able to
gg (g...@catking.net) wrote (in part) (on 2009-03-08 at 20:55):
Sounds good. If exporting to original name with original options is
readily accessible from a top level menu without having to retype the
name that would be pretty good.
I am concerned about whether this would require you
23 matches
Mail list logo
