hi all,
i have downloaded gegel and babl fron the following link
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gegl/0.0/gegl-0.0.22.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/babl/0.0/babl-0.0.22.tar.bz2
But when i reach inside the unzip folder of gegl-0.0.22 through the command
prompt and give the command ./configure ( the
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want
GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would
require 2 things:
a) support multiple brushes in a SVG brush file, ala GIH (presumably
a group for
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
How useful are brush pipes (or image hoses) really? As far as I can see
their primary use is for simulating brush transformations. We can
already do that better on the fly.
Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want
GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would
require 2 things:
a)
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is
no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes
and as such should remain to be supported. I myself have made for
example a hose brush that
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
Hi,
Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this?
Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
No and no respectively, IMO.
Don't need full image-hose functionality for this;
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gowers wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
How useful are brush pipes (or image hoses) really? As far as I can see
their primary use is for simulating brush transformations. We can
already do that better on the fly.
As
On Friday 13 March 2009 14:02:04 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is
no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes
and as such should remain to be
Hi,
00a...@gmail.com (2009-03-13 at 2306.16 +1030):
Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this?
Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
No and no respectively, IMO.
Don't need full image-hose functionality for this; however IMO at
least 2d
Hi all,
My name is Ding Jie, and Jenny is my English name. I'm a first-grade
post-graduate student, major in Image Processing, and very interested
in algorithms of this field.
Thanks for neo's suggestion, I found SIOX is very interesting. I have
read some paper about SIOX written by Gerald, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
