On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
I wonder if importing a plug-in from another plug-in is really
something
that we want to support. If the goal is to share code, then perhaps
the
code that is worth
Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes:
Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ),
depending of the last selected layer is a problem.
This used to annoy me a lot, because I frequently want to delete,
say, the
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Akkana Peck akk...@shallowsky.com wrote:
Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes:
Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ),
depending of the last selected layer is a problem.
On 03/05/2010 03:20 AM, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758
I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think?
Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
the
I've always hated the way that worked, I've got a script that deletes
the active layer, then sets the layer underneath it to active if anyone
wants to use it...
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#
# delete-layer.py - Version 1.0
# Copyright (C) 07/11/2008 by Jerry Baker
I've verified the behaviour is inconsistent, at least which could be
considered a bug. I assumed it would go to the last drawable, but
that isn't so...
Deleting a channel always makes the channel that was below it active
(regardless of the active order before), unless it is the last
channel, in
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
I agree with Joao S. O. Bueno and disagree with David Bowers.
Well, I'm glad you don't disagree with me, but who is that?
Its better to make plugins meet the normal expectations of Python
programmers (you can import any Python file to
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:41 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 08:01 -0500, lloyd konneker wrote:
I agree with Joao S. O. Bueno and disagree with David Bowers.
Well, I'm glad you don't disagree with me, but who is that?
Sorry I mangled your name. BTW David Bowers is a
I understood gimp 2.7 will fix this kind of problem, if that´s the case,
then I will be waiting for 2.7.
About Jerry way of doing things I think it makes more sense (at least)
to me. I do not know very well how to use your script but I´ll find a
way to give it a shot buddy.
Em Sex, 2010-03-05 às