I don't know PS after CS3, I heard it had horrible performance, by the way :)
After all, I did not try to imply that the brush engine is being neglected and
I needed to tell you to work on it, of course not. Just statet what I think is
necessary, if that's already being approached, simply take
Hi,
I am very interested GIMP and want to join the Gimp project as C
developer. I am a first-year PhD
student in computer vision. I would like to start with fixing some
bugs and then implement new
features and my final objective is gsoc 2011.
Do you have any suggestions?
Xianghang Liu
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:36 PM, xianghang liu xianghang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am very interested GIMP and want to join the Gimp project as C
developer. I am a first-year PhD
student in computer vision. I would like to start with fixing some
bugs and then implement new
features and my
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 07:55 +0200, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
I also might want to map Tilt (which GIMP currently has no support
for)
That is incorrect. GIMP has had support for Tilt for more than ten years
(since before version 1.0). It was limited to the Ink tool though until
recently.
Sven
Hi,
s...@gimp.org (2010-07-20 at 1409.51 +0200):
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 07:55 +0200, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
I also might want to map Tilt (which GIMP currently has no support
for)
That is incorrect. GIMP has had support for Tilt for more than ten years
(since before version 1.0). It was
Just the other day I was wondering if there was some way of
configuring *fewer* zoom steps because I find the 66.7% and 150% steps
in my current install particularly objectionable, I'd be happiest with
[100% / n] for the zoom-out series, and [100% * 2^n] for the zoom in.
Ed.
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 09:00 +1000, Edward Coffey wrote:
I'd be happiest with
[100% / n] for the zoom-out series, and [100% * 2^n] for the zoom in.
I don't think you can please everyone :) I often work at 300%.
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
