On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:24:18PM -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote:
It would be nice (IMO) to have a dockable that displays the numbers
of the transform tool's current selection and transform, and also
applies numerical input to the
jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
As a result of this strange design, it's impossible on Windows to
write a .exe that can be used smoothly both from the command-line and
from the desktop.
I've written a couple of applications that run from the command line and
happily throw up windows and interact with
On 2 March 2011 12:52, Graeme Gill grae...@argyllcms.com wrote:
jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
As a result of this strange design, it's impossible on Windows to
write a .exe that can be used smoothly both from the command-line and
from the desktop.
I've written a couple of applications that run
Martin Nordholts enselic at gmail.com writes:
On 03/02/2011 04:33 AM, GSR - FR wrote:
Hi,
enselic at gmail.com (2011-03-01 at 2214.48 +0100):
Thanks, I've added your items as well as mapped features into GIMP
releases up to GIMP 3.8. (I implicitly include both 'color adjustment
On 3/2/11, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
I can remember there was an intention to rewrite iwarp plug-in as a tool...
It's doable on top of the gegl op that powers Cage transform tool.
That op only :) has to be tought working outside of the cage. Sounds
like a good GSoC project to me.
Alexandre
On 3/2/11, Michael Grosberg wrote:
Adjustment layers = per-pixel value change (hue, levels, etc - stuff from
the colors menu) Such layers have a mask and adjustment properties but
no actual color content.
Filter layers = real-time application of filters (sharpen, blur, distort)
that changes
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I've changed Adjustment layers to 'Layer filters' for now, and added
Layer effects. Ideas for better names are welcomed.
Most of the effect plug-ins are under a Filters menu so using Layer
filters makes a certain amount of sense.
The term layer effects should be used carefully. PhotoShop uses it for a
set of modifications
that can be applied nondestructively to a layer, including blurring, color
adjustments, and a limited
number of other specific things.
-- Bill
___
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 07:14 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
Chris Mohler cr33dog at gmail.com writes:
When you start messing around with perspective transform and you drag corner
points every which way, scale and rotate numbers become meaningless. So,
Precise numbers are not that useful for a
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:52 PM, LightningIsMyName
lightningismyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The nearly finalised project list for GSoC 2011 is available at the
wiki: http://gimp-wiki.who.ee/index.php/Hacking:GSoC_2011/Ideas
Users who have a comment on the list should raise it now. The
For some reason my text disappeared when I hit send for the previous message
-- sorry! Here
is what I wrote:
It is very important to make sure that each project in the list has a
developer who is prepared
to sign up to mentor it. There are two reasons for this. First, because it
is a waste of
Hello all,
Porting GIMP plugins to GEGL operations
There are many many GIMP plugins that would need eventually to be
converted to GEGL operations, if we want to use them in future
versions of GIMP.
Though I'm not a student, I've been meaning to give something back to the
Gimp Project for
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 20:03, Andreas Plath apl...@gmail.com wrote:
Though I'm not a student, I've been meaning to give something back to the
Gimp Project for sometime now. The idea above strikes me as a good place to
start, though I might be wrong ... am I? :-) If not, I'd need a few pointers
On 3/2/11, Andreas Plath wrote:
1) Looking in the GIMP and GEGL dev sites, I found a list of library
dependencies for GEGL but not one for GIMP. I haven't downloaded the source
yet, so perhaps there's such a list in there. If not, where can I find it?
My computer runs a vanilla Ubuntu 10.04
jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but if they are tagged as CLI .exes (which they will be if you
can run them from the command-line and the CLI blocks until they exit)
when you run them from the Windows shell by double-clicking an icon
you will get an annoying extra console window linked to
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:03:42PM -0300, Andreas Plath wrote:
Hello all,
Porting GIMP plugins to GEGL operations
There are many many GIMP plugins that would need eventually to be
converted to GEGL operations, if we want to use them in future
versions of GIMP.
1) Looking in the
Hi,
I would like to implement the following layer mode in the GIMP:
1) Transform destination and source pixels to HSL space.
2) Note original destination pixel saturation.
3) Set luminance component of destination pixel to luminance component
of source pixel.
4) Transform destination to HSV
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a little uneasy at the moment about the ban working with numbers for
transformations comment.
It would be nice (IMO) to have a dockable that displays the numbers
of the transform tool's current selection
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Jörn P. Meier li...@netgods.de wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement the following layer mode in the GIMP:
1) Transform destination and source pixels to HSL space.
2) Note original destination pixel saturation.
3) Set luminance component of destination pixel
On 03/03/2011 02:00 AM, Jörn P. Meier wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement the following layer mode in the GIMP:
1) Transform destination and source pixels to HSL space.
2) Note original destination pixel saturation.
3) Set luminance component of destination pixel to luminance component
Let me start by noting that although I was once pretty familiar with the
Gimp code, I haven't
looked at it in a couple of years. That being said, this discussion is not
making sense to
me. Plug-ins do not access Gimp core functionality directly, they use an
interface library
known as libgimp.
On 03/03/2011 07:21 AM, Bill Skaggs wrote:
Let me start by noting that although I was once pretty familiar with the
Gimp code, I haven't
looked at it in a couple of years. That being said, this discussion is
not making sense to
me. Plug-ins do not access Gimp core functionality directly,
22 matches
Mail list logo
