Martin, with all due respect, your focus in releasing 2.8 ASAP should be on
integrating fixes that are completed, not battling to bring in new
functionality
such as layer groups. What's the point of layer groups if the layer transfer
modes don't work correctly? More important than that is that
2011/3/16 Carol Spears ca...@gimp.org:
martin, if in, oh, lets say 3 days, March 18, 2011 the majority of your list
items are not commited, perhaps you should consider stepping aside.
releases
don't attract developers. look at the history! gimp-1.0 - gimp-1.2, 1997
thru
2000. lots of
2011/3/16 Charlie De charlieco...@yahoo.com:
Martin, with all due respect, your focus in releasing 2.8 ASAP should be on
integrating fixes that are completed, not battling to bring in new
functionality
such as layer groups. What's the point of layer groups if the layer transfer
modes don't
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Charlie De charlieco...@yahoo.com wrote:
My criticism is for the whole team involved in these decisions, I don't wish
to
single out Martin or ask anyone to quit.
I understand your frustration, but you need to understand why we do
things the way we do. Patches
There was a recent update to configure.ac:
commit 514a5548cdcaf5a60f47067007936dc58055132b
Author: Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org
Date: Mon Mar 7 15:43:45 2011 +0100
configure: require GLib = 2.28.1
I have a recent ubuntu and it has 2.26.x and so GIMP won't configure and
build anymore.
Hello,
perhaps everyone can calm down. What is the problem with this bug? If
it is an missing review, then it's OK to move it to 2.10, because we
don't have any developer for doing it. But if it is something with the
patch then Rupert could fix it.
Regards,
Tobias
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:13 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
There was a recent update to configure.ac:
commit 514a5548cdcaf5a60f47067007936dc58055132b
Author: Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org
Date: Mon Mar 7 15:43:45 2011 +0100
configure: require GLib = 2.28.1
I have a recent ubuntu
Martin,
Could you please demonstrate your sincerity by escalating the 'bug' to
critical?
It would demonstrate commitment to really having this in 2.10, rather than just
'looking at it'. I think you owe it to the developer to make that gesture at
the
very least.
Good luck with all the work
Charlie De (charlieco...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Could you please demonstrate your sincerity by escalating the 'bug' to
critical? It would demonstrate commitment to really having this in
2.10, rather than just 'looking at it'. I think you owe it to the
developer to make that gesture at the very
On 03/16/2011 04:38 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:13 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
There was a recent update to configure.ac:
commit 514a5548cdcaf5a60f47067007936dc58055132b
Author: Michael Natterermi...@gimp.org
Date: Mon Mar 7 15:43:45 2011 +0100
configure:
On 03/16/2011 04:38 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:13 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
There was a recent update to configure.ac:
commit 514a5548cdcaf5a60f47067007936dc58055132b
Author: Michael Natterermi...@gimp.org
Date: Mon Mar 7 15:43:45 2011 +0100
configure:
On 16 March 2011 19:33, Patrick Horgan phorg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/16/2011 04:38 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:13 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
There was a recent update to configure.ac:
commit 514a5548cdcaf5a60f47067007936dc58055132b
Author: Michael
If I understand correctly...
You don't want to apply patch with serious functionality, because
stable release is coming and there is no time for that.
At the same time I noticed incorrect behaviour of UI
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643155) which happeneded
month ago, and which
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 00:23 +0100, Jacek Poplawski wrote:
I know nothing about politics and fights between Gimp developers, I
just want to understand the development process (I use Gimp almost
everyday, so it's very important to me).
It's not a question of fights and politics.
It's a very
14 matches
Mail list logo
