is this correct: when 1.4 is released, gegl is expected to be ready so work
can begin on gimp-2.0.
if so, when? (in relative sense, ie. which gimp 1.3.x version will be the
version just before 1.4?)
also, i have a proposition for a simple gui enhancement which could
drastically boost speed of
Sven Neumann wrote:
If you think that the GTK+ menu system needs improvement, it's
probably best to involve the GTK+ developers.
yes.
What about proposing
your changes on the gtk-devel list?
will do.
As far as I know, the gimp2 CVS module is dead. I'm not sure if it
makes sense to revive it.
the app/core directory appears to have been deleted from anoncvs.
various methods i tried hoping it was my error rather than a problem on the
server have failed. (making a fake CVS/ directory, using the -d switch,
both 'cvs update app/core' and chdiring to app/core and running 'cvs update',
even
tor:
you reminded me of a feature which would GREATLY improve the functionality of
gimp: moving through the active palette's colors with shortcut keys.
i'll create a patch for it at the first opportunity (after learning how to add
menu items). its such a uber-useful and simple feature i'm
here know why GimpPalette is
implemented using a list? it seems a lot saner to use an array.
i would like to convert it to use an array if possible, as it would simplify
future enhancements, and hopefully remove the need for the 'position'
attribute.
--
david gowers
don't see a good rationale for either. maybe its just a hack that avoids
having to calculate which color was clicked on using the realized widget
dimensions.
---
david gowers
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
An 'adjust related keybindings' menu item for relevant docks would help a lot
to ease keyboard-configuration. This would open the prefs-configure keyboard
shortcuts dialog, scrolled to the relevant area.
the difficulty of dynamic-keyboard-shortcutting, you can avoid by creating a
shortcut
[ and ] for the
purpose).
I want to do this soon, as i really tire of not having it, it is so
ubiquitously useful for any painting. Is what i described currently possible?
Can i do it in some better way?
David Gowers
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
Maybe it would be best if someone could come up with a reasonable example
what supersampling might be useful for in gradient blend code
GSR (?) already gave such an example.
It might be worth considering only supersampling when the end of a segment is
a different color than the start of the
whoops, I don't understand Gmail's reply system, and accidentally sent this to Sven only instead of the list.-- Forwarded message --From: David Gowers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mar 12, 2006 11:49 AMSubject: Re: [Gimp-developer] help needed with menu tooltipsTo: Sven Neumann [EMAIL
I've got the time to work more on this http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130123(actions to change to next/prev palette color)
but am not sure what I should do.It works fine, pragmatically, and is clean. The current implementation uses the colormap editor if it's available and the image has
On 6/16/06, Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakub Steiner writes: You can preview the looks of the new GIMP icon set here:Nice icons! I have one comment about the SIOX icon in the light set.In current CVS, I find that the SIOX icon looks very different from
the rest. It constantly draws my
.. I meant to send that to the list. Sorry if this is duplicated; gimpdev didn't show up on the list of recipients.-- Forwarded message --From:
David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Jun 21, 2006 10:59 PMSubject: Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal
On 6/22/06, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://carol.gimp.org/bikeshed/images/screenshot-2006-06-21.png
Okay.
It looks like there is a bug in the SIOX tool/gui that causes it
to return to the foreground setting unexpectedly, until the Control key
is first pressed, then it works as
... AARRGH.
Accidentally sent this to Sven instead of the list!
Sorry Sven.On 6/23/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tool only does foreground extraction (hence its name). There's no
toggle that would turn it into a background extraction tool.
Makes sense, actually
.. I replied to the wrong address again; argh.On 6/24/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/23/06, Gerald Friedland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not quite understand your problems.I am an aloof developer whohas serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
out, maybe I
On 7/26/06, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal for implementing vector layers in the GIMP---Henk Boom is working on implementing vector layers for the GIMP andhas made nice progress. He basically has vector layers that work, a
rudimentary
On 8/2/06, Pedro Alonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I am developing Gimp Perspective Clone Tool in the context of SOC.
- Now I have to develop a gui so the user may define the perspectiveplane in a similar way that they do via perspective tool. Using
GimpTransformTool. I don't know how to do that
On 8/4/06, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. In image, clicking brings up a perspective tool wireframe (notpreview). I manipulate the wireframe as I would for the perspectivetool. To finish, I double-click the image.
The rest that you described sounds fine.
Single-clicking near the middle of
On 8/4/06, Chris Moller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple weeks ago I submitted a gimp enhancement bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348291
that included a patch that lets the user select how to compare pixels
(the current RGB comparison, comparison just on the red, green or
This looks wonderful.
Some questions while I compile:
* How does it handle patterns? An example would be useful. This reminds
me that I need to fix the Clone tool to allow setting the source offset
for patterns.
* Does CTRL actually govern the 'set plane'/'clone' toggle or is that just a
.. accidentally replied to only Sven. Message follows, I believe it's relevant.
-- Forwarded message --From: David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Aug 11, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Perspective Clone ToolTo: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 8/11/06,
Sven Neumann
On 8/11/06, Pedro Alonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,By other way some things in the tool that have to be fixed are:- When you define the perspective plane, changes the mode to clonepaint, and go back to change the perspective plane mode, it doesn't
works.
Actually, it does work -- you just can't
I've written several PyGimp plugins, but when I go to the 'recent
filters' menu or try to rerun one, it is disabled. I can run it okay
and it produces the expected results, but I can't rerun it.
to clarify, I'm using the simple gimpplugin.plugin class (GimpFu is far
too heavyweight and slow for
On 8/11/06, Seth Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the better question is why is it runnable at all? The install_procedure call has an argument of '' for image types it can work on; since you're under the Image, this should be dynamically changed based upon the characteristics of the image
On 8/11/06, Pedro Alonso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use a keyboard interface is also a good idea, but still to be done.. :)About to see the mouse pointer while setting the perspective plane..currently the cursors are used in the same way as in perspective tool,
They aren't! I can see my mouse
On 8/12/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually... For your tool to work similarly to the clone tool and perspective tool, I just realized it MUST be able to disable interpolation. Otherwise it doesn't work on INDEXED images (have you tried it on an indexed image yet?)
I just tried
On 8/14/06, Henk Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently finished implementing the saving and loading of theselayers to the GIMP's XCF files, so they are in a usable state. I wouldvery much like any constructive feedback you have, especially withregards to how you would like the stroke / fill
There is a flag for making a parasite undoable (GIMP_PARASITE_UNDOABLE?)Are you saying that this flag doesn't work? It does for me in PyGimp -- I use it most of the time.On 8/24/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parasites:Is there a philosophical reason that parasite changes are
Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink tool? I find the hard edged rendering used in INDEXED mode best for drawing lineart, but dislike the other constraints (no drawing modes/opacity/layer modes) imposed by working in INDEXED mode. So far, I've tried to find the part
I have an image. And I want to have two 'views' of the image -- not in the sense that gimp uses the word 'view', but I want an RGB version and Indexed version. I wrote a plugin to do this; if it detects a first time run (ie. no alternate views exist), it duplicates the image, converts it to GRAY
On 8/29/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gegl doesn't support images with indexed colors and I very much doubtthat it ever will support it. It is rather likely that indexed mode willbe completely handled by load and save plug-ins in a gegl-based GIMP. If
there's a need for editing indexed
On 8/29/06, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot use the smudge or blur|sharpen tool, gaussian blur doesn't work neither does unsharp mask, layer masks seems to work but get their alpha thresholded.Neither of which are something one usually needs in a situation where
one wants to
On 8/29/06, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pretty positive that these problems could be sorted out when we know what people working with palette-based images want to have. I am just guessing on the needs here...Having an implied conversion to RGB on input of indexed drawables is
the
On 8/30/06, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 8/29/06, Henning Makholm My concrete need is that I edit bitmaps with a specific color convention - they can be seen
e.g. at http://dk.trackmap.net/a.I use a system of ad-hoc software to convert the
On 8/30/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:14 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: Your idea of real work is obviously very different from mine. I do lots of real work on indexed images.Perhaps you should write up a summary then that explains your workflow
on real world
On 9/13/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 00:13 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Your plugin needs to take an image as its first input in order to be repeatable.What do you mean when you say repeatable? What you are
saying here doesn't make any sense to me.So that it can
When I am doing this by hand, I do the following:1. Copy the image/layer (as in Edit-Copy)2. Enter QMask mode3. Paste the copied data into the QMask4. Anchor the floating layer created by pasting.
5. Exit QMaskIf the edge-detection algorithym you're using only cares about overall intensity
On 9/15/06, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]Some plug-ins (edge detection for example) provide images as a result.
If their result is required as a selection, I new only one way to makeit: create layer mask, copy the image into the mask and
On 9/15/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, William Skaggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some plug-ins (edge detection for example) provide images as a result.
If their result is required as a selection, I new only one way to makeit
On 9/15/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone broke the undo grouping in CVS gimp. The attached plugin provides 'layer to selection' and 'image to selection' functionality. 'layer to selection' has one
image.undo_group_start() but two image.undo_group_end()s. This is because
On 9/15/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm fairly sure it originates in the floating selection code, this bug.
It looks like that problem was a compilation glitch; 'make clean;make' fixed it. ^_^
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp
On 9/17/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 09:39 +0930, David Gowers wrote: It's much easier to code 'image to selection': c = pdb.gimp_channel_new_from_component(image, GRAY_CHANNEL, 'TEMP IMAGE2SELECTION')
This works for grayscale images only. An RGB image doesn't
On 9/18/06, Juhana Sadeharju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, I open an image and create a new view (View/New View menu).Then when I use the rectangle selection tool, the solid line is visibleonly in one view. The selection's non-solid line becomes visible in
both views.Why the tool's solid
On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see any logicin having the selection tools possessing the ability to move selectioncontents, it is much simpler and more intuitive if they limit themselves
to selecting regions and not engage
On 9/28/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:48 +0930, David Gowers wrote: On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see
any logic in having the selection tools possessing the ability to move selection
On 10/4/06, Christopher Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are the 2.2.13 options.I have to say I don't see a differencebetween 'pick' and 'move' for the normal/shifted case but I didn't tryMove moves the current item; pick moves the item that it thinks you're clicking on. In
2.3.x, the tool
On 10/12/06, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.I have a suggestion for a new and simple way to interact with GIMP.A major difficulty in using GIMP, in my experience, is that the menusare too many and too deep.To invoke an action on an image, or to
open a dialog box, the user spends a lot
On 10/13/06, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/12/06, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[...]
it doesn't map directly to normal menus. For example, there are layer-transform menus and image-transform menus, both of which contain
On 10/13/06, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This can be avoided if the order of commands is predefined.Newcommands would have the least priority, unless they are expliciltymoved relative to others.For example if I add a new command rotatecolors and query for rotate, it would appear after
On 10/14/06, Philip Ganchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately not. It is a key found on keyboards with the 'Windows' keys or their equivalent. GTK treats it as an indication to pop up the menus (Alt does sort-of the same thing; Shift-F10 does exactly the same thing)
You're not suggesting
On 10/15/06, Saul Goode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some anomolies could be looked at, I can free-rotate a layer but not an image.Erm, you can.That is true, but it is non-obvious; and particularly, I only just discovered (due to your prompt) that transforms apply to all linked objects, not just the
Quoting the ChangeLog:2006-10-16 Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.in: Set enable_python to yes if it wasn't set to no.
Fixes display of Python status in Optional Plug-Ins section. Does this have any effect on whether or not I'll be able to use PyGimp in Windows (2000)?I've installed
On 10/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 0:10:25, David Gowers wrote: *glib, pango, gtk, python, pygtk..Which Python distribution did you install? Current GIMP versions arecompiled with ActiveState Python 2.4
, but I'll probably switch to theofficial
On 10/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice feature , shame there is absolutely nothing in a line of- to suggest this actually does something.To me, if I can select a menu item, it does something.Personally I had no trouble discovering this feature. I agree that it
Checking the UI again, if there is any confusion as to the function of , shouldn't get a tooltip saying 'Tear off this menu'?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On 11/17/06, Nils Nordén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this feature is already implementednow all it needs is some
tweaking.
Here I have illustrated some tests with the advantage of flow in
photoshop, and compared it to the behavior of the gimp airbrush. At
the bottom you can also see the
On 11/18/06, Nils Nordén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Photoshop settings I used for opacity were 100%, and Brushes
Palette Other Dynamics Opacity control: pen pressure
Gimp settings were Opacity: 100,0 and Pressure sensitivity: Opacity
[check]
So, there should be no differences there
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't give any specific details, nor post my code, because I assumed
that- once explained- the problem would be a general one with a
straightforward answer. At the time, I thought it was easier to use the
standard example, which was
So, are you saying that you never receive events where event-type ==
GDK_2BUTTON_PRESS?
Is there any other way to implement the action you want to bind to
doubleclicking? No other tool uses doubleclicking, and consistency is often
preferable. Enter should probably be kept even if you do implement
: register the extension.
# BUG: its name does not show up in the 'starting extensions' part of gimp start up.
# How do I fix this?
gimp.install_procedure ('extension_fooify',
'extension-fooify','EXTENSION-FOOIFY','David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]', 'David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006','WHAT
On 12/16/06, Paul Gnuyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what full specifications look like for tools in the gimp
but here's a shot.
The Polygonal Selection Tool
Selects regions by connecting points clicked with line segments
Like polygonal select, shift on first click adds to
Hi,
Is there some way of convincing GIMP to send warning/error/informative
messages to a useful place on Win32? I have some PyGimp plugins, written for
Linux GIMP, that either fail to register their procedures or do not run
properly when I install them on the Win32 platform. Debugging 'blind'
On 12/20/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 21:20 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Before I can announce this on the gnome-i18n list, we should address
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141443. This means someone
should go over the gimp-tips and check
On 12/20/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 18:52 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I already did so (and checked again just now). All but one of them are
applicable as far as I can tell.
I've changed the tip based on your suggestion.
Actually, I was hoping
On 1/15/07, Bart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written some scripts for enhancing my workflow (like in Photoshop
creating a floating selection with or without copy).
That particular function is built into gimp. CTRL-ALT-drag and
ALT-SHIFT-drag
But what i'm
missing is the possibility to
On 1/17/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
So I was asked to suggest new features on the mailing-list and only
file bug report after they have been discussed there ... and it seems
theres a misunderstanding to be resolved and i wouldn't mind more
exposure for this ... :)
My
Also consider reopening the bug report -- you can do this since you're the
reporter, and as Sven resolved it WONTFIX under a huge misapprehension of
it, I recommend doing so. It may influence the volume of discussion on it
here.
___
Gimp-developer
On 1/18/07, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok - I've read the request and got the idea.
I have the followwing proposal:
what if one had a set of pre-loaded selections, and could switch back
and forth among then with a single keystroke - Do you (and others)
think it could
On 1/18/07, Manuel Quiñones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular guides. I know this is ugly,
and maybe your idea about
Manuel pointed out, The gimp currently lacks any way for a plugin to get a
coordinate from the image (eg. click on the 'seed' pixel). I've often wanted
to do this, and it is a bit awkward without it. Has implementing this been
avoided, or is it just an oversight?
Some example usages:
* Color
On 1/18/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually work with a bunch of alpha-locked layers (paint shape in
flat-colour,
lock alpha, paint shadows, light, texture ...)
I guess the perfect zone implementation would actualy need some overlap
to have the same effect of alpha-locked
On 1/18/07, Bart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm developing a script that insert the clipboard as a layer (its based
on older existing scripts) and to avoid error messages to the user i'd
like to check up wether the clipboard is empty or not.
How to do that?
Maybe Script-fu has a similar
On 1/19/07, cedric GEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some weeks ago, i've involved on Irc to do a kind of Gimp brochure to
show new functionnalities, one in the style i already made for Scribus
or Inkscape. You can get it at
http://www.le-radar.com/temp/Brochure2-4b.pdf
I reached the step where it
On 1/23/07, Kevin Galligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to script something that seems relatively simple, yet
I've spent the better part of today stuck at one little step. I have
started naming things with curse words, so I figured I'd reach out for help
before I start throwing
On 1/25/07, Kevin Galligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I settled on that route after some wrestling...
*** CODE HERE ***
(set! shadowMask (car(gimp-layer-create-mask shadowLayer ADD-ALPHA-MASK)))
(gimp-layer-add-mask shadowLayer shadowMask)
(gimp-selection-all inImage)
On 2/24/07, Alexandre Prokoudine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to be used (1x, 2x, 3x, 5x, etc.).
It doesn't soom to differ significantly from existing Navigation window
It does! Navigation window provides a zoomed out view of the entire image --
this provides a zoomed in view of the area that
On 3/8/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you rotate by exactly 90 degrees, this is always done with
INTERPOLATION_NONE, no matter what you select in the tool options.
Perhaps this is the culprit? An offset seems unavoidable if the
transformation is performed without
On 3/12/07, D. Stimits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not found any python-fu way to close a file, or to reclaim
memory after creating an image or layer. Is there such a thing? Is there
instead some sort of garbage collection?
hahahaha!
gimp.delete(image)
or
gimp.delete(layer) #only do
I am hereforth asking you to apologise, if possible, both in private
and on the list for this message. We are runing a project needing
I cannot sincerely do so, in this instance. I do not apologize for
expressing my amusement, unless I judge that the situation was genuinely
worsened by my
On 4/1/07, Chris Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/31/07, Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might consider using a color transform using ICC profiles. For
example
you could use sRGB as your generic destination color space and perhaps a
SWAP
profile for the CMYK side. Once you
On 6/7/07, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Sven Neumann
One cannot do this, in general, because an indexed PNG stores a single
alpha value for each palette entry. An image with an unrestricted
alpha channel would most likely lead to more color/alpha combinations
than the 256
Well, only if the source dependency for the various lexers has changed
(eg. recently with the The GIMP - GIMP global replacement). A
rebuilt version of the relevant generated files should probably also
be updated into SVN before release.
Currently, flex version 2.5.33 or higher seems to be
On 6/7/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:10 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
Well, only if the source dependency for the various lexers has changed
(eg. recently with the The GIMP - GIMP global replacement). A
rebuilt version of the relevant generated files
On 6/8/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 19:31 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
As far as I can see, updated versions of the generated files have been
committed to SVN. What exactly is your problem?
Don't know. I just did the standard './autogen.sh;make
On 6/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:13:03 +0200, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
modifying that code base to deal with this properly will most probably
been seen as more lasting contributions than changing code that
eventually only will live
filepath.diff adds a 'file path' field to the 'Image Properties'
dialog; I did this after some discussion between gg and myself on the
importance of being able to find out the path easily.
Image_metadata.diff changes the title used by the 'metadata' plugin
for its window. Mainly, it's just so
On 6/27/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless what he's implemented is bad why not just comit anyway until you
get around to doing it better/diffeently?
I rejected the patch for several reasons, all of them
Sven, you suggested that I run valgrind to locate the source of a bug
related to eyedropping. These are the highlights of the results.
This part is probably unrelated to the eyedropping bug (bug #450802),
but may be serious:
It happens after the image is loaded; don't know whether it's before
or
On 6/27/07, Roberto Uhlig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
has/knows anyone a script/plugin (an idea) to go color by color through an
indexed color-palette and doing an action for each color?
I d like to create from a picture with an optimized color-palette with ca.
5-10 (may be 1-256)
On 7/5/07, Roberto Uhlig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello and best thanks first,
but it doesn't work correct on my xp-pc with gimp GIMP 2.3.10.
After private consultation with saul some testing and some changes for
windows (backslash \) now it works fine.
Essential change is, that saul's
;;
On 7/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:12:03 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does your reply indicate you take a this feature not a bug approach
here
and you think is
On 7/10/07, Tom Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im going to go nuts - i do not understand the gimp work flow with selections.
When I paste an element on to a layer, i can no access the area of the layer
not covered by the element. In on specific example, I moved the contents of a
layer
On 7/10/07, Tom Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, sounds like Chris suggestions may do the trick. I will try it our 1st
thing in the morn when I get back to work.
It looks to me like you moved the layer itself rather than its
contents,
i used the move tool with not hot keys.
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:46:44 +0200, peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Really? Let's have a look at the product vision. 'High-end'
is the word I want us to focus on.
Please dont distort this by taking one word out of context.
On 7/14/07, Kevin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is this: where is the 8-bit per color channel limitation in
GIMP? That is, which bits of the source code limit the GIMP this way?
I ask because I took a brief look at the source, and it seems the
internal color representation is
On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:03:18 +0200, Chris Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try to follow the analogy without this becoming rediculous:
[misrepresentation and reactiveness cut]
We all know that jpeg is lossy. You use it with suitable
On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:23:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does current need to be saved as a third option? It is either equal to
default or original unless it is set during a save in which case it become
the new value
On 7/20/07, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have only tested pyGEGL with the 2.4 version of Python. It
possible (or very likely?) that something has changed in the 2.6
version of Python. I don't have the 2.6 version installed at the
moment so I can't investigate this
BTW, Nick Coghlan said:
The most likely culprit is that some of the code is using PyMem_Free on
a pointer allocated with PyObject_Malloc (or vice-versa). This has
always been illegal, but prior to 2.5 the Python memory allocator tied
itself in knots to try to avoid crashing when client code broke
1 - 100 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
