Hi there,
I recently uploaded teh 1.3.14 source code, to start to look around the code.
Actually, I humbly intend to actvely join GIMP's development along the next
couple of months, if I can get enough of what is going on.
./configure, make make install went as smoothly as one could ever
I am taking a deeper look at the GIMP manual (even when you are
messing with the source itself, the GIMP is so full of surprises,
they neve stop showing up)
And I noted some features on that manual (which is mostly from GIMP
1.0 times, I believe) that are missing on the current program. Such
I was thinking abiut the subject , and came to
a way of doing it - if PDB calls can be made normaly
from inside these plugins - which I assume thay can, without problens.
Therefore, if you will allow me, I will describe what I was thinking in
gimp pseudocode. Someone more familiar to the core
Hi,
On Sunday 08 June 2003 06:13, Stefan Klein wrote:
Hi all,
I am a computer science student looking for a final year project.
I'd love to do something in the Open Source community and I am
looking around where my help might be needed. Having a little
interest in graphics design and
Hi again!
I wrote yesterday that I was writting a XOR layer combine mode.
Well, today it just working fine.
While it does have it's interesting applications, I think that including it
as a default layer combine/paint mode would bloat the User Interface,
as undoubtley, there are lots of other
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )
wrote:
where
are the programmable layer effects?
Hmm..are these the ones I did suggest I could do a couple of weeks
ago?
I am working on them...unless the freeze is quite soon, It may very
well go into 1.4/2.0 .
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 00:25, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )
wrote:
where
are the programmable layer effects?
Hmm..are these the ones I did suggest I could do a couple of weeks
ago?
I am working on them...unless
On Thursday 19 June 2003 06:05, Bowie J. Poag wrote:
Is this the right forum to discuss new filter ideas? If so, I have
one i'd like to share.
Maybe...
But might be gimp-user, or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just send the idea at once. :-)
Cheers,
Bowie
On Friday 20 June 2003 07:10, Marco Wessel wrote:
On 20 Jun 2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Don, 2003-06-19 um 21.44 schrieb David Neary:
I'll get the ball rolling: 2.0
I wil stay with 1.4
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 22 June 2003 06:55, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current default tile cache size is 32M. I would like to
suggest 128M as a more reasonable default value for 1.3 CVS.
Are there any objections?
Yes. 128M sounds unreasonably large. I think
Hello ...
Where have teh GAP filters gone in the 1.3.x tree?
I've found them in the plug-ins-gap in the 1.2.x,
and I am intending to modify the filter all layers, to do aply another
filter with variable parameters based on the Value information of a
mapping drawable.
Easy to do, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:06:00PM +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the two big platforms where the GIMP will be used in the
future are GNOME and KDE. Both of those follow the HIG guideline
of Ctrl-Shift-Z. On windows, the main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:07:30AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of the first things I teach to one who is learning the GIMP is the
dinamic shortcut allocation.
Which has gone out of 1.3 (yes, you can enable
Sven Neumann wrote:
I would agree with you if we would force the user to calibrate her
monitor. But please note that you can go thru the full user
installation process by hitting the default button 5 times. Now
compare this to the installer of whatever windows software. It's just
silly to say
Christopher W. Curtis wrote:
The downside to using 'ar', really, is that WinZip doesn't support it.
I haven't verified this - I hope a Windows user can do so for us. Just
for reference, attached below is a CP of an ar archive I just made:
Hmm..that just seens just plain as no downside at
I tried the patch. It worked just fine, and IMHO should be used
as a fix to the aforementioned bug.
I tried to aply adptive supersampling with maximum depth,
to compare the effects with the ones from the patch: I had to kill out
gimp after 20 minutes of 90% CPU use and no response.
Austin
On Friday 18 July 2003 16:59, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to inform you about our plans for the GIMP 2.0 release.
(...)
Originally we wanted to get GIMP 2.0 out at GimpCon. Since that is
actually in three weeks, we will definitely not make it but I am
still optimistic that we will
On Monday 21 July 2003 4:47 pm, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Patrick McFarland wrote:
So, if gegl isnt going to be in gimp2, when will it be?
Ive been waiting for gimp2 awhile now, and now that gegl wont be
in it, I have to keep waiting. How long will I have to wait now?
2.2? 2.4?
gegl isn't a
Hi,
Maybe some of you can remember that, when I joined this list
about two months ago, I proposed a programable
layer combine mode for the GIMP.
The basic idea is that besides the normal addition darken only
layer modes, to implement a custom mode. In it, the user gets to
type a c-like
Hi there.
The information about the CVS modules on the web is this bit
(from http://www.gimp.org/devel_cvs.html )
__
(...)
The avalable modules relating to gimp are are:
gimp
gimp2 (no code here, just holding place for ideas)
gimp-data-extras
gimp-plugins-unstable
glib
gtk+
gegl
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 09.31 schrieb David Neary:
Up until pretty recently, GNOME CVS had a habit of creating a
module as an alias for a directory... I suppose this was so that
the aforementioned cvs co -c would work... there is actually no
way to know what directories exist
Hi.
I do not know the X11 license, but changing the license of
the plugin template recalls me of one thing:
If the GIMP is under the GPL, with no exceptions listed were
appropriate, them it is ilegal for non GPL-compatible plugins to be
installed.
This is quite clear on the GPL-FAQ.
And for
On Friday 25 July 2003 1:36 pm, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-24 at 2031.28 -0300):
The basic idea is that besides the normal addition darken
only layer modes, to implement a custom mode. In it, the user
gets to type a c-like expression of what
On Saturday 26 July 2003 5:44 am, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
My idea is that in the end, the custom layer formulas get
recorded in a gimp directory, just like brushes and patterns.
How are they recorded in the XCF file? (I may have missed
that part of the thread
On Sunday 27 July 2003 3:13 pm, Daniel Egger wrote:
- I'm not sure which article to use for GIMP in German so I
normally don't write one. A male article sounds more strange than
none at all but if we can find a good ruling -- all the better.
In Portuguese, the current use is for a male article
As we say in my land, her e I come selling my fish again. :-)
Back to the Custom Layer Mode.
On Saturday 26 July 2003 9:44 pm, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Also, the additional layer blending modes are nice. Ive used both
Grain modes already in some images, and they are nice additions to
plain
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 1:25 am, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 28-Jul-2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
It will be doable by typing:
ED = E1 + E2 -0.5;
as the custom layer mode. (E stands for every channel. A is
already used for alpha - I myself dislike the every, and will
accept other
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 5:38 am, you wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example, this is the line in current gimp code that does the
merge mode :
sum = src1[b] + src2[b] - 128;
It will be doable by typing:
ED = E1 + E2 -0.5;
I don't want to discourage
Niklas Mattisson wrote:
- Bugs have now changed to be a section with information and there is
HOWTOs in that section now also. I wrote a How To Submit a Patch this
weekend also and would like people to look at it and give me comments
and some feedback to make it even better.
Maybe you could add
hmm...Agreeded.
I'd suggest 10 days instead of 5 (if I, for an example, am on a heavy
workload week, 5 days could not be enough to make my points, if they
need soem expermenting on the codebase), But since the decision was
taken, so mote it be - it's not gonna hurt.
As for the foundation., I'd
Postscript files with a text editor, just as you can do with XML.
Regards,
JS
--
Mukund wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:32:00PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
| But on this new thread were proprietary formats batle along with mutant
| ideas, here I go:
| Why not settle
Stephen J Baker wrote:
Austin Donnelly wrote:
How is the serialization done then, just a raw 32-bit IEEE float
dump with a predefined endianness? 64-bit doubles just as easy?
The real problem comes when your code is running on a system without IEEE
float support, and you need to manually
On Monday 25 August 2003 9:32 pm, Branko Collin wrote:
Sometimes, when I get bored, I start scouring forums on the net for
GIMP related chat. Of course, it's extra double plus fun to search
Adobe.com's forums for talk of the GIMP. Most of it is talk about
GIMP-print, of course.
--==+++==--
As far as I am concerned, I'd be pleased to see it there.
If they aprove it in Europe, it will be a matter of a few months
before they catch on here (Brazil). We are at risk even with Europe
being free.
Regards,
JS
--
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 10:07 am, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
So, did you guys know that Disney considered using the GIMP and/or
Cinepaint, but instead paid some coders to make sure PS runs in
WINE?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1210083,00.asp
Yup.
When this was on Slashdot I did
ok, 4:21 n the morning...
I just could run gimp 1.3.19 now.
I don't know how many of these changes came in after 1.3.19, but
I can only see 2 modes on the tools options.
I am feeling sleepy, and I could not follow the guidelines below . It
seens me that the edit mode is not there at all. I
I've sent this yesterday, but I have bnot seen it on the list. I think
my local IP may have got blacklisted, so I am trying again.
Js
--
-- Forwarded Message --
ok, 4:21 n the morning...
I just could run gimp 1.3.19 now.
I don't know how many of these
Ok, for startting:
Closing paths should definitely be a matter of one click
starightforward thing.
So it must be doable on the default extending mode without any extra
modifier key. I know you have beiong strugling with it - the previous
ctrl_alt_shift_click, and the current ctrl + drag show
. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(...)
Yup...
Instead of changing the alpha channel when adding a layer mask, create
an option besides apply layer mask. I think Replace
Hi Simon,
So...there are they guys talking about pre1 already...
I could not have the time for myself to even compile 1.3.20 yet (will
do in a few minutes, I hope)
How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note all
thetouchs on the UI finished?
If s, I believe
Can someone point me to a howto or explaination on how are the files
firstly generated?
I usually run everything in English here, but I was browsing the
pt_BR.po, and it is looking a little worse than if the translations
were done by an authomatic engine.
I'd guess no one at the connectiva
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 1:11 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure. README.i18n contains the basics of how to use gettext.
The inaccurate Rough Guide is like this... you copy an existing
po template file to one named after your localisation,
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 9:30 am, Daniel Egger wrote:
Re: [Gimp-developer] PO files
Date: Today 9:30:45 am
From: Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message was signed with unknown key.
The validity of the signature cannot be
On Monday 22 September 2003 9:33 pm, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
Hi,
I've been rooting through the source for gimp-1.3.20 looking in
vain for the functions that handle the layer combination modes.
Can someone please point me to the right files?
TIA,
gimp/app/paint-funcs
The easies file to have
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 22 September 2003 9:33 pm, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
Hi,
I've been rooting through the source for gimp-1.3.20 looking in
vain for the functions that handle the layer combination modes.
Can someone please point me
Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-24 at 1132.48 +0200):
I'd just like to say: Well done. I managed to create a A1 poster at 600
dpi - a whopping 1.1 Gig of picture data (about 2x14000 pixels).
Was there a real difference between 600 DPI and 300 DPI? I
Ok. let's see.
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arranging for the GIMP to be able to generate PDFs with text layers
as text is on my todo for 2.2 list.
To get that done in sane way, you'd have to use a PDF Pango backend.
There is such a beast but last I
On Friday 26 September 2003 7:19 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I have never enve looked at Pango.
You will not get around it, see below.
My idea would be to get the text chars and attributtes from the
GIMP, generate a image without
I don´t know who will be doing it, but it was not until this week that
I noted taht there is no way of printing more than one coppy at once
with the print GUI. Not in 1.2.5 at last (at work is what I use. At
home, I have no wrking printer at the moment)
And also, if it cannot be made possible
Will you excuse me...but ..what CTRL-Y has to with REDO alltogether?
CTRL + R - R is the first letter in REDO.
SHIFT + CTRl + Z - Shift acts as amodifier to the CTRL + Z UNDO.
CTRl + X - Stays next to Z and allows for fat toggling as has been
argued.
But...
CTRL-Y? Why not just stick with
Thanks to the native SVG support! :-)
Surelly, it would be a nice time to have the new site in place already.
JS
--
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/07/130202
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will
point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns,
including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the
latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17. Could 1.3.21 be announced there in
the next minutes?
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 2:43 pm, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
Hi,
On Monday I downloaded the latest gimp-1.3.21, expecting to be able
to have a sparkling new version to play with by sometime that
afternoon. No such luck. I'm running into the following problem:
checking PANGOFT2_CFLAGS...
On Saturday 25 October 2003 4:35 am, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Re: [Gimp-developer] Spam bad!
On 24-Oct-2003, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Nuclear weapons good!
Am I the only one getting spam via the mailing list?
Nope..it is hitting everybody.
Hi there,
The subject of colour management surfaced in the last days on the GUG
list.
I am still with no time to look at the GIMP :'-( ...but this e-mail
bellow just look TOO promising.
I hope someone here can take a deep look at it. :-)
JS
--
-- Forwarded Message
Hi Monis,
is:
gimp_path_get_point_at_dist
working like the old one?
I have a really cool script that renders a POV-ray sweep alogn a path
that uses this.
It will work in 2.0, or I will have to keep 1.2 around. :-)
Anyway, I cannot spare time right now to write PDB's :-(
(I had done it once,
No vacancy here
On Sunday 23 November 2003 13:56, David Odin wrote:
gimpmiscui.h also defines the gimp_plug_in_get_path() function
which is only used by the FractalExplorer, gfig, and gflare
plug-ins. This function doesn't look really useful, since it is
only a wrapper for
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 11:42, Tino Schwarze wrote:
Although I have a strong opinion against click-to-focus, it's
probably the most widely used default and expert users are used
to changing this setting anyway, so the default makes sense.
However, it would be great, if the window
Other effects aside, I am all for preserving the RGB values of each
pixel, regardless of it's alpha value. If there is garbage in there,
once the mask has the alpha channel, it can be selected by color
and one can cut away the previously transparent areas quite easily.
Also, the nominations copy
On Monday 01 December 2003 19:00, David Neary wrote:
(...)
And Alpha channel to Layer Mask is unclear?
If there is an action of copy alpha to mask and one other of move
alpha to mask, then alpha to mask, IMO, is not clear.
Actually I dislike the way they are spelled right now
(/me run
Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp 1.3
(no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my python fu stuff so far),
it is interesting to mention that as of now gimpImage neither
gimp.pdb.gimp_image_new seens to be working.
On Sunday 14 December 2003 21:29, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno
wrote:
Since it talks specifically about GIMP python
Raphael, can I ask you a thing?
You could maybe just add (or ask someone to add) a zero-out
transparent pixels on the layers menu.
This will make you possibly happy, and will NOT arbitrarily throw away
data that is relevant to more than one group of users as this thread
had shown.
Maybe, if
with a transparent hole of about half it's size
got a 15% file size decrease.
I will polish my changes a little and submit the patch do bugzilla. If
anyone wanna try it, just tell me now.
JS
--
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 10:31, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Raphael, can I ask you
Actually, this will be quite possible with the custom layer mode I
was cooking a couple months ago, and which I plan do revive to Gimp
2.2 ..
As an effect that applyes to the layer itself,like the dissolve
layer mode, instead of on combinations, it is doable there.
One will just have to write
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 21:44, Patrick McFarland wrote:
I tried PS to see how it handles Alpha. I became quite
frustrated. Once I deleted a part of the image and saved and
reloaded it, I found *no* way of increasing the opacity of
partially transparent pixels, not to mention totally
On Sunday 21 December 2003 18:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
I actually think Joao S. O. Buenos patch to the PNG plug-in is a
nice addition/work around the optimization problem - I have yet
to try it out, though.
I haven't tried it either, but
Hi there,
I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug
report.
I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in CVS
HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of the
gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled.
Anyway, the fill is
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 19:40, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am going out right now, and have no time to fill a proper bug
report. I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working
poorly in CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In another message you wrote:
I was working, and noted that gradient fill is working poorly in
CVS HEAD - the first color, or beggning of the first segment of
the gradient, is taking up almost all the area to be filled.
Have you
I've tried Simons Patch, and it seemed very nice for me.
Of course I am innoi position to word out what should and should not
be commited, but from a user point of view, it is nice.
Unfortunately I could not check GSR's patch because of compiling
issues.
Regards,
JS
--
On
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 13:07, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to draw the GIMP developer's attention on this Advogato
article. It has some interesting comments and links and somehow I
get the feeling that it would be unwise to ignore this subject:
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 12:27, Simon Budig wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've tried Simons Patch, and it seemed very nice for me.
Of course I am innoi position to word out what should and should
not be commited, but from a user point of view, it is nice
Hi there.
I am translating it into brazillian portuguese. The GIMP translations
are part of the Gnome Translation Project. I had even joined the lis
of the pt_BR translators. Most likely there is are nice resources to
it translators to.
The home page for the gnome translation projects is:
Daniel Egger escreveu:
On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:35 am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Image manipulation is one of the key application areas that needs to
be addressed for open source tools to become the mainstream desktop
environment. I'm currently funding a number of different open source
projects,
Hi there.
I am updating the translation because some strings had changed on the
last couple days.
I thought it is interesting to mention that the string:
#: app/gui/image-menu.c:1744
Which is
Other (%s) ...
Is copyed from another one (as fuzzy) by gettext as
a _Other (%d:%d)
from somewhere
On Friday 19 March 2004 09:56, Raphal Quinet wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:17:06 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Other (%s) ...
Is copyed from another one (as fuzzy) by gettext as
a _Other (%d:%d)
from somewhere else. That means that in a lot of languages we will
have
Hi all,
Sven,
would it be too troublesome to call this release that will just finish things
that have started, as 2.0.X series, instead of a 2.2 ?
JS
--
On Thursday 25 March 2004 14:20, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Do a 2.2
answering his own question.
Good, it is there. We will need a PDB proc. for that too.
You made no comments on the vector layers api, do you think they are feasible
into 2.2?
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have also one other improvement I think I could work on, and this
would
On Thursday 22 April 2004 15:52, David Neary wrote:
I hope I'm not the only one asking myself this question... what
is a CSG operation?
CSG stands for Constructive Solid Geometry, and is used to refer
to operations like union, intersection, add and subtracting geometric
forms in a computer
On Friday 23 April 2004 08:10, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the best way
(although cumbersome) to figure out who is working on what. Maybe we
could make this easier by processing the ChangeLog
Or..press ctrl+shift + i - it is faster than hovering and guessing .
On Wednesday 28 April 2004 18:42, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
Perhaps additional information in the status bar messages showing the
selection dimensions and offsets would work? (Shown as a
I like this idea.
Stan, would you mind filling this as a request feature at GIMP bugzilla?
It helps developers keep track of the features wanted, and you will have some
feedback on it each time it is considered, or implemented, by the developers.
http://bugs.gimp.org
Thank you.
JS
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 05:53, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi, there is an interesting discussion on the gimp-users list. i
forward this because i am suggesting that the floating layer
stuff be changed or even removed from this new gimp that has
Hi,
I just tried the new photocopy, cartoon and softglow plug-ins, and
IMHO, when compared to similiar ones, the correct colocation of them
would not be in the artistic category. They'd better fall under
distorts, maybe with softglow going into Light Effects
I have not checked the wiki for
Hi there,
I've been greping the code in search for a nice implementation for
enhancements described in bugs 143216
(Airbrush does not take into account speed )
and 150227 (PIPE_SELECT_VELOCITY unimplemented for painting with brush
pipes)
Basically, both need the time information of a paint
01:57, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi there,
I've been greping the code in search for a nice implementation for
enhancements described in bugs 143216
(Airbrush does not take into account speed )
and 150227 (PIPE_SELECT_VELOCITY unimplemented for painting with
brush pipes)
Basically, both need
A Monday 29 October 2007 16:24:11, Sven Neumann escreveu:
I suggest that we keep brainstorming for the 2.6 roadmap for another
week and then collect the ideas. It would be nice if we could end with a
list of well-defined tasks. When that list is collected, I would like to
discuss which of
A Friday 09 November 2007 13:01:06, você escreveu:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:36 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
One other smallf eature I will want to add is the ability to add free-
angled guides. I have this almost complete on my codebase, just .XCF
saving for it is missing. I should
A Sunday 11 November 2007 20:48:27, peter sikking escreveu:
but the real question is the priority of this yet-another-feature.
something like geometry tools integration has a much higher priority
than this.
There eason I proposed this at this stage is that I have this feature
complete minus
A Thursday 15 November 2007 14:27:30, Lionel Tarazon Alcocer escreveu:
I am developing a plug-in which makes use of SVG files to store Gimp
Vectors. The Import functionality is quite straight-on due to the
gimp_vectors_import_from_file(), but I haven't found a function which works
the other
Hi Shin,
I'd hardly find this useful but for some very specific patterns.
Instead, I'd suggest you tried using layers and layer masks in your workflow,
more or less like this: once you select the area to be filled, create an
empty layer, create a layer mask on it, choose from selection (and
On Sunday 02 December 2007 01:29:39 am William Skaggs wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the idea of having this functionality available. I have tried the
patch and it seems very capable. There appears to be bug which presented
itself when I did the following: ...
Thanks for the bug
On Monday 03 December 2007 06:19:21 am Jayesh Salvi wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to see what all methods gimpfu.pdb offers, by running dir()
operation on it. But it crashes as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] plug-ins]$
PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/usr/lib64/gimp/2.0/python python
Python 2.5 (r25:51908,
On Sunday 16 December 2007 09:48, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
as announced earlier, some GIMP developers are going to meet at the
24th Chaos Communication Congress (24C3)
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/
We already discussed that travel costs for such events should be
reimbursed from GIMP
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 17:42, William Skaggs wrote:
This mixes together two separate issues. Tags are, as I have
already agreed, an excellent way of doing a search mechanism. They
don't get rid of the need to have a workspace, though. Suppose I
want to switch back and forth between
On Thursday 17 January 2008 14:45, William Skaggs wrote:
From: peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chiming in here (getting back to speed). [...]
Peter! Great to hear from you again!
I absolutely agree about the virtues of a tagging system, but
I fear that the difficulties are not being
On Friday 18 January 2008 15:08, William Skaggs wrote:
In any case, let me ask a basic sort of question about user
interaction. Suppose I'm a user, painting with a set of brushes.
I decide that I want to use a certain grunge brush. (Let's
say I have a specific brush in mind, but all I
On Monday 25 February 2008, kamila giedrojc wrote:
Dear GIMP team,
Hi,
I've added a talk I'd like to give there:
http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/index.php/PythonTalkLgm3
It goes well beyond GIMP, but I hope it is ok for everybody.
js
--
Libre Graphics Meeting 2008 is
Hi,
Iṕ've been talking to Schumanl and Prokoudine this afternoon, and they
agreeded to indicate me to be GIMP's Google Summer of Code Admin
(mostly: contact person), for 2008 edition.
I am willing to pick the role, but I have to know if everyone agrees,
or if someone else would like to do it
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo