Re: [Gimp-developer] Brushes/input controllers changes idea

2008-03-11 Thread Joern P. Meier
Alexia Death schrieb: On Friday 11 January 2008 01:29:17 David Hodson wrote: I wrote a proposal to enhance the gimp brush code quite a few years ago, which can still be found here: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimpbrush.html You might want to see if it contains any useful

Re: [Gimp-developer] Brushes/input controllers changes idea

2008-03-14 Thread Joern P. Meier
Alexia Death wrote: Gimp is large code wise. I opted for trying to understand the bits I'm working on and not the whole thing at once ;) That would only be the ultimate goal, of course. ;) I have been hacking in the event side of things since early this year and I'm slowly starting to get

Re: [Gimp-developer] Scaling in Gimp 2.6 is much slower than in Gimp 2.4

2008-10-29 Thread Joern P. Meier
Hi, I don't think the performance is the biggest issue. However, the results of current (i.e. Gimp 2.6.x) downscaling are. In Gimp 2.4 I could use the Cubic Option which resulted in a little blurring, but that could be fixed with a judicious use of the Sharpen filter. So in the end, it yielded a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Scaling in Gimp 2.6 is much slower than in Gimp 2.4

2008-10-30 Thread Joern P. Meier
Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:52 +0100, Joern P. Meier wrote: The new Gimp 2.6 Cubic option usually yields too bad quality to be considered (I won't even begin with Linear). I guess you are running into bug #556248 here (which will be 'fixed' in 2.6.2). That may