Alexia Death schrieb:
On Friday 11 January 2008 01:29:17 David Hodson wrote:
I wrote a proposal to enhance the gimp brush code quite a few years
ago, which can still be found here:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimpbrush.html
You might want to see if it contains any useful
Alexia Death wrote:
Gimp is large code wise. I opted for trying to understand the bits
I'm working on and not the whole thing at once ;)
That would only be the ultimate goal, of course. ;)
I have been hacking in the event side of things since early this year
and I'm slowly starting to get
Hi,
I don't think the performance is the biggest issue. However, the results
of current (i.e. Gimp 2.6.x) downscaling are.
In Gimp 2.4 I could use the Cubic Option which resulted in a little
blurring, but that could be fixed with a judicious use of the Sharpen
filter. So in the end, it yielded a
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:52 +0100, Joern P. Meier wrote:
The new Gimp 2.6 Cubic option usually yields too bad quality to
be considered (I won't even begin with Linear).
I guess you are running into bug #556248 here (which will be 'fixed'
in 2.6.2).
That may