Pals,
I made my first plugin in C for gimp, based on the one here:
http://developer.gimp.org/writing-a-plug-in/3/index.html
Unfortunately, this plugin has several bugs, that translated to my
own, and I am not being able to detect them (is there any other
source like the avove to get
* El 08/03/07 a las 1:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] chamullaba:
In general just try to keep cool. You are perfectly right in
complaining about being lead astray by a bad code example and in
your place I would be equally pissed off about the time I had
wasted. I'm sure dismissive comments don't to
My plugin is working fine, after I found my bug and the one in
the blur example. It's just annoying.
Then please explain the bug in the example code and send us a patch
(preferably against SVN) that we can apply so that others won't run
into the problem again.
Pals,
I realized that gimp 2.3.15 (and some versions before) comes with
zoom for previews. A very useful feature for what I want to develop
(a noise reduction plugin).
I added a line 'gimp_zoom_preview_new (drawable);' that I got from
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:
plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe
This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a
blocked toilet!! I should call out a plumber
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 11:22 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
I added a line 'gimp_zoom_preview_new (drawable);' that I got from
http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/libgimp/GimpZoomPreview.html
The plugin complies just fine, but when trying to run it in
gimp 2.3.15 the plugin crashes
Hi Sven,
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:11 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
I compiled gimp with './configure --prefix=/opt/gimp'
for it not to touch my stable gimp 2.2 RPM install.
I am compiling the plug-in with
/opt/gimp/bin/gimptool-2.0 --install plugin
You will probably have to set
gg,
I didn't get your joke at a first sight.
English is not my language...
BTW, it was funny. :)
L.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi Ori,
* El 12/03/07 a las 19:55, Ori Bernstein chamullaba:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:36:42 -0300, Luis A. Florit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am doing something wrong... I tried with this command:
Yes, yes you are.
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig ; /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3
Pals,
I am feeling so silly in trying to develop a plugin...
I am stalling even at the most easy tasks.
Now, I just want to blur my drawable from my plugin.
I tried this:
GimpParam *rreturn_vals;
gint nnreturn_vals;
rreturn_vals = gimp_run_procedure(plug_in_blur,
Hi Bill,
Now, I just want to blur my drawable from my plugin.
I tried this:
GimpParam *rreturn_vals;
gint nnreturn_vals;
rreturn_vals = gimp_run_procedure(plug_in_blur, nnreturn_vals,
GIMP_PDB_INT32, GIMP_RUN_NONINTERACTIVE,
Pals,
As you noticed, this is my first plugin and I have many silly
questions... Sorry for bothering you with these.
What my plugin does is an iterpolation to get rid of noise by
means of a classical local analysis of a square neighborhood or
radius r of each pixel to change it (if
Sven and Bill,
I see. My plugin is already reasonably fast, so is good to
know I don't need huge changes.
Thanks a lot for your prompt answer!! Nice forum!
Cheers,
Luis.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Pals,
The Despeckle plugin shipped with GIMP 2.3.15 has a strange
behavior: it shifts the image 1 pixel to the right, and one down,
at least in some channles. Compare with the plungin in gimp 2.2.
Probably you already observed this.
Thanks,
Luis.
Pals,
I reported this bug in this list some time ago, and got no
answer (I think), and the 2.3.16 version still has the same bug:
The despeckle plugin shifts the image one pixel to the right,
and one to the bottom. Consequently, it is essentially useless.
If you draw in the middle of a white
For Bill:
I reported this bug in this list some time ago . . .
For philosophical questions, it is good to bring them up first
on this list. But for actual bugs, in the sense of the
program doing something that is clearly incorrect, it is
best to file a Bugzilla report. The advantage,
Glad you all confirmed the bug, and sorry gg if I misunderstood you.
However, I am not sure what histogram correction means here.
I saw the same shift in the despeckle plugin for photographies,
like a human face.
Thanks,
Luis.
___
Gimp-developer
Hi,
I am getting an error on the script round-corners.scm (gimp 2.3.17).
A pop-up window opens with the following error:
Procedural database execution of gimp-image-undo-group-end failed:
and just that...
Thanks,
L.
___
Hi,
Is there a way to read the output of a bash command inside
a script-fu? I want to make a script-fu that uses the ExifTool
program output.
Thanks!
Luis.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Sorry for the empty email I've just sent. My mistake.
Now, about my question:
Is there a way to read the output of a bash command inside
a script-fu? I want to make a script-fu that uses the ExifTool
program output.
This is to answer Kevin:
Save the output from the ExifTool to a file
* El 04/06/07 a las 16:49, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris chamullaba:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 22:47, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to read the output of a bash command inside
a script-fu? I want to make a script-fu that uses the ExifTool
program output.
Thanks
Hi,
I am having an 'overwrite file' problem in 2.3.18.
When trying to save a file that already exists, ask as
usual if you want to overwrite. If you say YES, it does
NOT overwrite, and writes a Untilted.xcf file instead.
Thanks,
Luis.
Hi,
Where is the option to save the EXIF data in 2.3.18??
Thanks,
L.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
* El 16/06/07 a las 16:09, Sven Neumann chamullaba:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 02:41 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
I am having an 'overwrite file' problem in 2.3.18.
When trying to save a file that already exists, ask as
usual if you want to overwrite. If you say YES, it does
Hi Mukund,
Hi Alexander
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:06:53AM +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Haven't found in bugs and SVN changelog. GIMP 2.3.18 (Windows) deletes
exif data from images.
There is a similar bug on bugzilla.gnome.org filed against the GIMP
component (it may have been
I have a Panasonic FZ50 whose EXIF data was always preserved by
GIMP. Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and
immediately saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the Save as...
dialog, there is no option to save (or not) the EXIF, as it always
was. Not evey a grey
Hi Mukund,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Here is the bug in question:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stated
Hi Mukund,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Here is the bug in question:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stated
On 6/22/07, Luis A. Florit wrote:
Thanks for (yet another) (double) stupid answer, Sven.
offtopic
We are not going to compensate loss of Carol by become rude
ourselves are we? Could we possibly take a deep breath,
count to 10 and smile friendlier to each other?
/offtopic
Alexandre
* El 22/06/07 a las 8:53, Sven Neumann chamullaba:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:18 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
From aggressive answers, to unanswered mails (not that bad),
It would help a lot if you could try to be more precise in your mails.
That would avoid the need to ask
Hi Mukund,
Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version = 2.3.18)
needs libexif = 0.6.15, while there is no RPM repository
with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
based distros have the libexif outdated).
Ah good. So there lies your problem :-)
Yes. Thanks for
Hi Sven,
So, yes, I state, publicly, again: this bug has been ignored for
months (in fact, for years, since Fedora 4, and we are now in
Fedora 7). No matter if you let me 'get away' or not.
These bug reports have not been ignored. They are not GIMP bugs and
have been reassigned
* El 24/06/07 a las 14:57, Sven Neumann chamullaba:
Bug GIMP is the only application, graphic or not, that showed this
problem, in several years of daily use. The mouse works on every
other application perfectly, and always did.
Did you actually try it with another GTK+ application that
For a long time, nothing has changed in GIMP with respect to XInput
devices. So the fact that an upgrade introduced this problem seems to be
a strong indication that the problem is elsewhere.
I have similar problems using a Genius tablet. Once I used the pen,
mouse is no longer detected
Luis wrote:
I tried to install Inkscape Fedora RPM, but for some reason the
last repository version seems highly broken (at least with my
package setup). I should compile it by myself when I have some
time (lots of libraries and dependencies).
There are autopackages available at the
Hi,
I am writting a (almost finished) plugin in script-fu and wanted
some features for the script-fu main option window of my plugin, but
I was unable to find this googling. So it's probably not possible...
I want to do these on the plugin option window:
1) Gray-out some options
* El 02/03/08 a las 15:25, Laxminarayan Kamath chamullaba:
I am not a GIMP developer, though I have been a spectator on this
list for a while now.
I suggest that you specify exactly what you are trying, and what
exactly you are looking for.
A detailed work-flow and a UI mock-up image would
Sorry, I thought I was clear enough (did I specify the solution??)
What I want to do is what is pretty standard in these cases:
You were certainly clear enough,
I thought I was...
but there is no way to do that using script-fu. If you need fine
control of the interface, you'll have to
Luis A. Florit wrote:
But I do not know if these are possible in script-fu, and I didn't
find a complete enough reference for script-fu.
There is some documentation about Script-Fu at http://www.gimp.org/docs/. I
have been putting together my own set of documentation for Script-Fu which
Hi,
I have a script-fu that worked fine in 2.4 and it's broken in 2.6.
It had a conditional to apply the layer's mask if it exists. This is
what it read:
(cond
((gimp-layer-get-mask SharpenLayer)(gimp-layer-remove-mask SharpenLayer
0))
)
Now it is broken.
How do I tell
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Perhaps we need to add gimp-layear-has-mask then. Until then you could
use gimp-plugin-set-pdb-error-handler to take over the error handling in
order to suppress the warning.
I haven't been following this discussion that closely; however, I
I haven't been following this discussion that closely; however, I
would point out that the PDB function 'gimp-layer-get-mask' will
return -1 if the layer does not have a mask.
Yes. I manage to use that in 2.4 (because some strange reason), but
the method does not work in 2.6. How
42 matches
Mail list logo
