[Gimp-developer] Suggested in memory image data structure.

2008-07-06 Thread Rogier Wolff
Hi, I'm trying to touch up the result of a panorama shot I took. This takes quite long, mostly because the image is too big to fit into memory. I would like to suggest a way of storing the image data in memory in such a way that it doesn't take so much memory. Or at least, it doesn't require

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggested in memory image data structure.

2008-07-06 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 05:51:24PM -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: Currently images are commonly stored as an array of rows of pixels. GIMP does in fact use image tiles. But then why, on a machine with 700Mb RAM, does EVERYTHING take so very long? My image is only 50Mpixel. Roger. --

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggested in memory image data structure.

2008-07-07 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:54:50PM -0700, Bill Skaggs wrote: On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But then why, on a machine with 700Mb RAM, does EVERYTHING take so very long? My image is only 50Mpixel. The minimum memory usage for a 50 Mpixel RGBA image

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggested in memory image data structure.

2008-07-07 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:54:50PM -0700, Bill Skaggs wrote: On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But then why, on a machine with 700Mb RAM, does EVERYTHING take so very long? My image is only 50Mpixel. The minimum memory usage for a 50 Mpixel RGBA image

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggested in memory image data structure.

2008-07-07 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 08:45:04AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: But as soon as you perform an operation on the image, the full-scale image data needs to be touched. Agreed. This is much easier to program. However, when I'm zoomed in to say a 4 megapixel part of the image, and the selection is in

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp default brush set contest

2008-07-08 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:27:41PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:10 +0300, Alexia Death wrote: Valerie wrote: The other half is that with brush resize in tool options now (where everybody can see it), even non-editable round brushes can be rescaled,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp default brush set contest

2008-07-09 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:26:59AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:14 -0700, Valerie wrote: I guess we have drastically different usages of brushes though. I NEVER use a brush of exactly 17 pixels. In fact, a brush of exactly 17 pixels is pretty much useless to