On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:25:37 +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > generally, you should use Bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/) to
> > report such problems. In this particular case, I'll take care of
> > fi
Hi,
Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 03-Apr-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > well, actually this is just an initialization and MAXPATHLEN is a
> > rather bad choice anyway. I'll just change it to some sane fixed
> > value instead.
>
> So _what is_ a good sane fixed value?
any val
On 03-Apr-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
> well, actually this is just an initialization and MAXPATHLEN is a
> rather bad choice anyway. I'll just change it to some sane fixed
> value instead.
So _what is_ a good sane fixed value?
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> generally, you should use Bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/) to
> report such problems. In this particular case, I'll take care of
> fixing it right now, so there's no need to open a bug report for it.
Sorry. I looked for
Hi,
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MAXPATHLEN is used unconditionaly in gimp's sources. POSIX allows
> not to define it, so systems that don't have a path length limit,
> like GNU, break on building the gimp.
generally, you should use Bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/) to
report
hello!
MAXPATHLEN is used unconditionaly in gimp's sources. POSIX allows
not to define it, so systems that don't have a path length limit,
like GNU, break on building the gimp.
please apply this little patch to fix it:
--- gimp1.2-1.2.3/app/app_procs.c.old 2003-03-29 19:39:54.0 +0100
