On 03/12/2010 11:09 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Do you really think there it is a big point to introduce a UI for
selecting compression?
Nah maybe not.
It would be nice to make 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 immediately interpretable,
for example by commenting or using local variables like so:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:14 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order of magnitude better
save-times, with 50% increase in file size.
Hi
On 02/27/2010 03:14 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order of magnitude better
save-times, with 50% increase in file size.
Hi Jon
Sorry for the late follow-up and thanks for maintaining the ORA plug-in.
50%
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 15:30 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:14 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order of magnitude better
save-times, with 50% increase in file size.
Hi Jon
Sorry for
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 16:35 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
[...]
IMO 50% increase in file size is not much for a file format that is
meant for archival and exchange of images.
Archival - it'd mean an extra 20 gigabytes to back up for one of
my old books archives for example.
Interchange - the
From 0e41e65f31ae07c91f2ed5dc8f0c51d05949be51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Nordby jono...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:28:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] OpenRaster: optimize PNG saving
Sets lower compression and disables interlacing.
On a 5 layer image of 4500x6000px this gives an order