On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:46 pm, Roman Joost wrote:
If the gimp-help-2 team has nothing against this, it'll be okey for me
to be published on the site.
Certainly fine with me.
Servus,
Daniel
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi all,
I sent this yesterday to gimp-devel but I used the scam.xcf.berkeley.org server,
which seems to be still having problems. Re-sending it. I'm also eaving gegldev
in the CC, just to keep a common thread for cross-posts.
===
The major problem that this project has at the moment is its
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the structure buy us? It gives people a point of access to
contact if they have suggestions, bugs, questions. It allows people
who want to get code included to contact someone directly for code
review.
I think our policy is to encourage
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the structure buy us? It gives people a point of access to
contact if they have suggestions, bugs, questions. It allows people
who want to get code included to contact someone directly for code
review.
I think our policy is to
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
It is a very common policy for a lot of projects that all bugs must be
reported in Bugzilla. Some projects even go so far that you must not
commit anything w/o refering to a bug-report. I don't think we need to
go that far but I think that it is important that bugs are
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If someone reports a bug and the bug is confirmed on the mailing
list, it's a 30 second job to enter it into Bugzilla if you know
bugzilla and have an account. I think that it would be nice for us
to accept bug reports via that channel, and then
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see why it should be that way. What's wrong about using
bugzilla for patches?
Nothing wrong with it, but bugzilla sucks for bigger patches or
features, where CVS directly is better. But then CVS sucks for
co-ordinating work
I would be willing to maintain the module maintainers list as well as any other lists relating to who to contact about this or that.
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:23, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see why it should be that way. What's
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:29:02AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
I'd like to propose that the following roles be defined and published
on the site (if it ever gets updated).
Help: Roman Joost
If the gimp-help-2 team has nothing against this, it'll be okey for me
to be published on the site.
