[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The GIMP Foundation

2004-03-08 Thread Kelly Martin
Dave Neary wrote: Daniel Rogers wrote: Avoid self-dealing. What's this? Self-dealing is whenever the people who control the organization command the organization to do business with themselves in their personal capacity. Self-dealing tears the veil and makes the director or officer who

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The GIMP Foundation

2004-03-08 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Mar 8, 2004, at 8:25 AM, Kelly Martin wrote: Dave Neary wrote: Daniel Rogers wrote: Avoid self-dealing. What's this? Self-dealing is whenever the people who control the organization command the organization to do business with themselves in their personal capacity. Self-dealing tears the

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The GIMP Foundation

2004-03-08 Thread Dave Neary
Daniel Rogers wrote: Avoid self-dealing. What's this? Be honest. Is this true of every board? Even Halliburton? 1. Will TGF have members? I am talking about members with voting privledges, like I described above. (my vote is yes, btw) Yes. 2. Should the membership be paid? (my vote is

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-19 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For those of you who were wondering why you couldn't verify my signiture: there you are. I had forgotten this problem existed. Thanks, John, for informing me of this. John Dietsch wrote: | Daniel, Where is your public key? I can't verify your

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As was discussed at Gimp Con 2003 (and before, frankly) I am in the process of incorporating The GIMP Foundation as a non-profit organization devoted to supporting the gimp. Thanks a lot for organizing this. Here are some of the ideas I am

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
Sven Neumann wrote: This sounds a lot more like an attempt to bring WilberWorks Wilber what? I plead ignorant. back to life than what I was imaging from such a foundation. IMO it should be a lot less commercially oriented but maybe I am only getting a wrong impression from looking at this list.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Raphaƫl Quinet
On 13 Oct 2003 11:55:27 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As was discussed at Gimp Con 2003 (and before, frankly) I am in the process of incorporating The GIMP Foundation as a non-profit organization devoted to supporting the gimp.

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Neumann wrote: This sounds a lot more like an attempt to bring WilberWorks Wilber what? I plead ignorant. Oh well, one should really run one's own internet archive. The website seems bought off and of course not much is left to be found

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Neumann wrote: | Thanks a lot for organizing this. you're welcome. - -- Dan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org