Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GPL discussion (was something else)

2004-05-13 Thread pcg
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:04:23AM +, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: According to you, this shouldn't be. Additionally, one would assume that these are additional restrictions that are explicitly forbidden by the GPL itself.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GPL discussion (was something else)

2004-05-13 Thread Dave Neary
Tor Lillqvist wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: According to you, this shouldn't be. Additionally, one would assume that these are additional restrictions that are explicitly forbidden by the GPL itself. But these restrictions are placed by the MySQL copyright holders

[Gimp-developer] Re: GPL discussion (was something else)

2004-05-12 Thread pcg
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:55:31PM +0200, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term modification.) I've read and re-read this, and I'm having trouble figuring out how anyone can consider a network

[Gimp-developer] Re: GPL discussion (was something else)

2004-05-12 Thread David Neary
Hi, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:55:31PM +0200, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: big snip So I hope it's very clear now that it depends. Ummm.. no. And getting unclearer all the time. Get used to it. The unclearness is *precisely* :) what this is about.

[Gimp-developer] Re: GPL discussion (was something else)

2004-05-12 Thread Tor Lillqvist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes: According to you, this shouldn't be. Additionally, one would assume that these are additional restrictions that are explicitly forbidden by the GPL itself. But these restrictions are placed by the MySQL copyright holders themselves, aren't