[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 17:50:13, Sven Neumann wrote: Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify the project for also using the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread David Neary
Hi Jernej, Jernej Simon?i? wrote: Not sure about what kind of proprietary scripts are you talking about - the installer scripts were always available... I'm glad you joined the thread, because there's one question that hasn't been answered yet. Would you like to have your installer's problems

[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 20:59:14, David Neary wrote: I'm glad you joined the thread, because there's one question that hasn't been answered yet. I've been subscribed for a while, but haven't really posted much (and I just noticed that the last 2 messages I did send never arrived to the list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, =?Windows-1250?Q?Jernej_Simon=E8i=E8?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify the project

[Gimp-developer] Re: reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-07 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 22:59:14, Sven Neumann wrote: I was under the impression that building a GIMP installer involved some black magic. After all there don't seem to be many people able to build GIMP from source on win32. Once you have the mingw+MSys environment set up, building Gimp is