Re: [Gimp-developer] Spamcop problem
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the > following problem: The gimp.org postmaster address is a much more appropriate place for this sort of thing than the developer list. Next time, use the proper channels, please, so that things can come to my attention sooner. > >This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). > > > >A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > >recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >(generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >host mail1.iha.dk [130.225.184.39]: 554 Service unavailable; Client > >host [128.32.112.247] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see > >http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?128.32.112.247 > > 128.32.112.247 is shill.xcf.berkeley.edu, which is presumably some kind > of gateway for gimp.org mail. So getting onto spamcop's blacklist > probably means that gimp.org mails aren't going to be too reliable for a > while. Using spamcop is a pretty dumb idea for a university to do, but then again, the admins at brix's university have show themselves to be rather not so bright in the past. What probably happened is an email with a forged from address that happened to be a spam trap got sent to an invalid gimp.org address, which generated a bounce message which got flagged as spam. I've turned on initial verification of receivers to mitigate this. Note that it's not actually listed in the db anymore. So mails are reliable, and your statement was unfounded conjecture. > Does anyone know what's wrong with beta.gimp.org at the moment? It's > mostly down, but it was up for a while yesterday evening. It's having some hardware or driver issues, which I've not nailed down yet. -Yosh ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Spamcop problem
Hi, Carol Spears wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: 128.32.112.247 is shill.xcf.berkeley.edu, which is presumably some kind of gateway for gimp.org mail. So getting onto spamcop's blacklist probably means that gimp.org mails aren't going to be too reliable for a while. great. what does this mean about seemingly good information about cvs versions coming from gimp.org addresses? Presumably it means that your ISp doesn't use spamcop to block spam, unlike brix's university. When I said that they would be unreliable, I meant that it may be difficult to send mail to gimp.org addresses - since the ISPs/company servers/university servers may be using spamcop. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary Phenix Engineering 110 ave Jean Jaures, 69007 Lyon ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Spamcop problem
Salute again, On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the > following problem: > > >This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). > > > >A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > >recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >(generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >host mail1.iha.dk [130.225.184.39]: 554 Service unavailable; Client > >host [128.32.112.247] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see > >http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?128.32.112.247 > > 128.32.112.247 is shill.xcf.berkeley.edu, which is presumably some kind > of gateway for gimp.org mail. So getting onto spamcop's blacklist > probably means that gimp.org mails aren't going to be too reliable for a > while. > > Does anyone know what's wrong with beta.gimp.org at the moment? It's > mostly down, but it was up for a while yesterday evening. > great. what does this mean about seemingly good information about cvs versions coming from gimp.org addresses? carol ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Spamcop problem
Hi all, I just sent a mail to a gimp.org alias, and it bounced with the following problem: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail1.iha.dk [130.225.184.39]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [128.32.112.247] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?128.32.112.247 128.32.112.247 is shill.xcf.berkeley.edu, which is presumably some kind of gateway for gimp.org mail. So getting onto spamcop's blacklist probably means that gimp.org mails aren't going to be too reliable for a while. Does anyone know what's wrong with beta.gimp.org at the moment? It's mostly down, but it was up for a while yesterday evening. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary Phenix Engineering 110 ave Jean Jaures, 69007 Lyon ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
