Von: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 22:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363775
Sorry, but I am unable to follow your way of handling bug reports. If
there's now a new bug that deals with remaining issues in bug #167956,
Hi,
before you start attacking the bicubic interpolation routines, could you
please have a look at the outstanding bug report for Lanczos:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167956
Would be nice to get this one closed finally. And we can't release 2.4
as long as it is still open.
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 22:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact that's exactly what I am working on.
If you look at my last post to the bug you linked above you will see I
started a new bug since this one was getting too long, confused and mixing
a number of issues.
Gg,
Google Scholar only finds one paper by RG Keys on this topic:
Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing
RG KEYS
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING,
VOL. ASSP-29, NO. 6, DECEMBER 1981
I was able to download a pdf of that paper using my
Hi Sven and gg,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All references to Keys' work seem to lead to papers published by IEEE and
available on a per article subscription. I assume the charge for one or
two articles would be fairly nominal.
Many thanks for the offer. Finally Simon was able to come up with a copy
of Keys' paper for me but I will keep your offer in mind since I came
accross several references to pdfs on IEEE that may also be useful.
Thanks to all for the many positive and helpful replies, and especially to
Simon for
In my on-going research to reduce the filter artifacts noted in
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166130 , I found many references
to a promising improvement on the cubic convolution kernel approach I have
been using.
As noted in the bug report using a convolution kernel entirely
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All references to Keys' work seem to lead to papers published by IEEE and
available on a per article subscription. I assume the charge for one or
two articles would be fairly nominal. Would this be a good use of some of
