On Nov 23, 2007 6:03 AM, GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2007-11-22 at 1544.46 +1030):
Hi Liam,
On Nov 22, 2007 9:45 AM, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evidence that auto levels loses details --
take a photograph (or a scanned engraving, or
I saved these notes for when there was a 2.6, but then got swamped with
other things... I can flesh them out more, but I'm not likely to have
time to do any programming in the forseeable future, I'm afraid.
selction optimization
on subtracting (e.g. control is pressed), compute
the
Hi Liam,
On Nov 21, 2007 5:00 PM, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saved these notes for when there was a 2.6, but then got swamped with
other things... I can flesh them out more, but I'm not likely to have
time to do any programming in the forseeable future, I'm afraid.
I've
Evidence that auto levels loses details --
take a photograph (or a scanned engraving, or whatever) and open
Levels, and press autl. Note that the little triangles marking
the end-points are not under the ends of the black part - in
other words there are multiple pixel values that are used in the
Hi Liam,
On Nov 22, 2007 9:45 AM, Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evidence that auto levels loses details --
take a photograph (or a scanned engraving, or whatever) and open
Levels, and press autl. Note that the little triangles marking
the end-points are not under the ends of the
