Guillermo, I would encourage you towards formalizing this application -
try to summarize objectively what exists today and what do you plan to
implement. Also, try some guestimates on a time frame for completing
each task.
Joao: Unfortunately I'm not a coder. I'm not even a student :)
Just
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:20 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
A lot of what was described about separate+ is already present in the
Gutenprint plugin for GIMP (and I think also in Cinepaint), and also
in PhotoPrint, which is a standalone application layered on the
Gutenprint core. I'd rather
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 04:07 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
About the plugin itself, it already provides profiles management.
Profile management should be left to the GIMP application and to widgets
provided by it. It doesn't make sense if every plug-in does its own
thing here.
It's
From: Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:42:04 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Guillermo,
On Mon 24 Mar 2008 14:01:00 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 13:34 -0300, Guillermo Espertino
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 13:34 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
First of all, sorry if this is the wrong place or moment to post this.
II think that integrating the separate+ plugin to Gimp would be a great
GSoC project.
Doesn't sound like it would be worth making this a GSoC project. In
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 18:01 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
As far as I can see all that is needed for integration of the seperate+
plug-in is someone who volunteers to review the code and the user
interface and to propose it for inclusion on this list.
An alternative that we should consider
Hi Guillermo,
On Mon 24 Mar 2008 14:01:00 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 13:34 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
First of all, sorry if this is the wrong place or moment to post this.
II think that integrating the separate+ plugin to Gimp would be a great
GSoC project.
