On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.3 is a development version with no API guarantees whatsoever. The
API is constantly changing and noone should be developing any
plug-ins for it.
If you have such a closed Gimp Club
Hi,
I am not going to respond on your mail in detail, mainly for lack of
time. Lots of good points being made and taken. However I would like
to state that I am not at all unwilling to mentor new developers. I
also think that our (and that includes mine) attitude towards new
ideas and requests
On 8/26/05, Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
On 8/27/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am not going to respond on your mail in detail, mainly for lack of
time. Lots of good points being made and taken. However I would like
Time is always an important issue, and a lack of it may cause
curtness. It'd be nice if everyone
On 8/26/05, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
the maintainer of the registry.
Sounds awesome.
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
change the list of links of types to a drop down box, maybe? (Dunno.)
2.3 is a development version with no API
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
change the list of links of types to a drop down box,
Hi,
Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.3 is a development version with no API guarantees whatsoever. The
API is constantly changing and noone should be developing any
plug-ins for it.
If you have such a closed Gimp Club attitude, why make developer
releases at all? After all, all
