I have some experience with using glade/libglade to program UIs (gtk
builder should be the same or better), so I wanted to chime in even if
I'm a few days late on it.
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 11:21 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
[...]
however,
let it be really clear that I will _not_ entertain the
Martin wrote:
Right now GIMP has virtuall all of the UI imperatively constructed
with
code. This has a few problems:
* Tweaking the UI requires re-building the app
* A lot of code duplication
* Not very modern
The patch I am replying to ports the PNG save dialog to Glade and uses
The conclusion was to go ahead so I will commit the patch soon after
changing glade to ui as per Sven's comment.
In response to Akira's comment on performance:
We need to be aware of that we are introducing extra disk IO which can
give us problems, especialy during startup if we have to load a
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
We need to be aware of that we are introducing extra disk IO which can
give us problems, especialy during startup if we have to load a lot of
files. In practice I don't think this will be a problem for a long
time
On Friday 08 January 2010 17:08:58 Martin Nordholts wrote:
Aurimas Juška wrote:
Why not to convert XML's to C code when compiling distribution ? XML's
are large and not very fast to parse. This approach would have all the
benefits of XML's while developing and would not cause additional
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:05 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
[...]
Why not to convert XML's to C code when compiling distribution ? XML's
are large and not very fast to parse.
Large - that's subjective. XML is not a compact format, though.
Not very fast - 50 MBytes per second isn't unreasonable
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:05 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com
wrote:
We need to be aware of that we are introducing extra disk IO
which can give us problems, especialy during startup if we
have to load
Hi,
Right now GIMP has virtuall all of the UI imperatively constructed with
code. This has a few problems:
* Tweaking the UI requires re-building the app
* A lot of code duplication
* Not very modern
The patch I am replying to ports the PNG save dialog to Glade and uses
GtkBuilder to
On 2010-01-07 16:45, Martin Nordholts wrote:
[...]
The patch I am replying to ports the PNG save dialog to Glade and uses
GtkBuilder to construct the UI. The purpose of this change is to
introduce declarative construction of UIs in GIMP to give us experience
in this area. The benefits of using
Ideally, would this be limited to dialog windows or, instead, the entire
user interface?
PiTiVi uses GtkBuilder to do this everywhere, and then uses python
after that. Point being that the heavy lifting is still done by GTK+
and GStreamer. GIMP is a significantly larger program, but I don't
Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010 16:45:06 schrieb Martin Nordholts:
Right now GIMP has virtuall all of the UI imperatively constructed with
code. This has a few problems:
[...]
The patch I am replying to ports the PNG save dialog to Glade and uses
GtkBuilder to construct the UI. The purpose of
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:45 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
* We use GtkBuilder, not the deprecated libglade
Why are the files still installed in a folder called glade then and
use the file extension .glade? Since we have the chance to do this right
from the beginning, that should probably be
12 matches
Mail list logo
