Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-06 Thread Ofnuts
On 09/06/2011 10:55 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> Haven't we got a quite nice Python interface already? > Yes we do, which is nice, but Scheme still has higher status. In > particular, the format of gimprc files etc are Scheme-ish, and the > default batch interpreter is Script-Fu. > The format of

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-06 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/9/5 Ofnuts : > On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can >> see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax >> where 1 + 1 is written "1 + 1" and not "(+ 1 1)". If we want to have a >> main script

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-05 Thread Ofnuts
On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can > see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax > where 1 + 1 is written "1 + 1" and not "(+ 1 1)". If we want to have a > main scripting language that as man

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blog article about Scheme usage in GIMP

2011-09-05 Thread Martin Nordholts
2011/9/5 Michael Schumacher : > I'd like to comment on the blog post, or see comments by someone else, but > I'd like to clarify our plans for Scheme in GIMP first. If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a sy