On 10/10/2010 04:01, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Quoting Ofnutsofn...@laposte.net:
Is there a practical, fast way, to detect this case, i.e, that the
selection covers the whole layer (or image?) and that no pixels remain
unselected? I assume that inverting the selection
Assume I have a selection on small area (for instance a 20px
circle),
and I invert it. Now, if I grow the selection by a sufficient amount
(10px in this case), everything gets selected.
Is there a practical, fast way, to detect this case, i.e, that the
selection covers the whole layer (or
On 09/10/2010 23:24, Owen wrote:
Assume I have a selection on small area (for instance a 20px
circle),
and I invert it. Now, if I grow the selection by a sufficient amount
(10px in this case), everything gets selected.
Is there a practical, fast way, to detect this case, i.e, that the
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net wrote:
Assume I have a selection on small area (for instance a 20px circle),
and I invert it. Now, if I grow the selection by a sufficient amount
(10px in this case), everything gets selected.
Is there a practical, fast way, to
On 10/10/2010 00:22, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Ofnutsofn...@laposte.net wrote:
Assume I have a selection on small area (for instance a 20px circle),
and I invert it. Now, if I grow the selection by a sufficient amount
(10px in this case), everything gets
Thinking off the top of my head, you could make a histogram call to
the selection channel at 255 (fully selected) and see if the
returned pixel count equals the number of pixels (width x height).
On 10/9/10, Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net wrote:
On 10/10/2010 00:22, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:
Quoting Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net:
Is there a practical, fast way, to detect this case, i.e, that the
selection covers the whole layer (or image?) and that no pixels remain
unselected? I assume that inverting the selection again and testing for
empty would work, but that would be two
