Hello,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lastly! I don't know whether this merges shadow-tiles in linear-light
> RGB or not. It appears that it does, but I haven't run proper tests
> yet :)
No, it doesn't.
David
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll see what happens when I make that change :)
> (apparently just one line, app/core/gimpprojection.c:391, is needed to
> be changed to implement this now :D)
This was slightly more complex than I said.
Somewhat hack
David Gowers wrote:
> So eventually we need to be able to construct on-demand babl_formats
> which utilize arbitrary profiles, and have babl depend on lcms to get
> a acceptably quick transform between those and the standard spaces?
> And recognize the use of standard colorspace profiles (eg sRGB,
Hello Martin,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David
>
> David Gowers wrote:
>> Ah, so if I want to make the result preserve the alpha of the
>> underlying layer, I'll need to do that via layer mask?
>>
>
> Exactly, masking should generally be perfo
Hi David
David Gowers wrote:
> Ah, so if I want to make the result preserve the alpha of the
> underlying layer, I'll need to do that via layer mask?
>
Exactly, masking should generally be performed *after* blending with the
new layer mode compositing model.
> FWIW, since you changed the mean
Hello Martin,
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. With a 100% opaque Addition mode layer put on top a completely
> transparent layer, the resulting composite becomes 100% opaque
> containing the unblended Addition mode layer pixels when using GEGL, but
