Sven Neumann wrote:
[]
I've asked Aaron a while ago to provide everything that's needed to
recreate the package and he added the link to ScriptExec.tar.gz at the
bottom in response to that request. I have to admit that I have never
verified that the application bundle can be created using this
Hi, Mat and others,
On Aug 20, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Mat Caughron wrote:
The issues raised seems to be mostly to be in point of documentation.
When
I do have time to maintain things, it is usually focused on doing a new
build, rather than documenting the process. This seems to be the
preference of
Hi,
Kurt Bigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Upon attempting to do this I ran into some problems and posted a
question to the darwinports mailing list (because I currently build
GTK+-2.0 via the darwinports gtk2 port). Someone replied to my
query with the information that the GIMP application
Kurt Bigler wrote:
[]
So I'm posting this question here not to find out more about how GIMP
achieved that and whether it will be easy for me to do the same thing
GIMP did in the gtk app that I am porting, and whether I can continue to
use darwinports to do my build or whether I need to go
Martin Costabel wrote:
Unfortunately, gimp-app does not give any information whether the gtk
build needed to be configured differently. If gimp-app were open source
in the sense of the GPL (which it pretends to be but isn't), you could
just look at the sources from which it was built and see
Brion Vibber wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Unfortunately, gimp-app does not give any information whether the gtk
build needed to be configured differently. If gimp-app were open
source in the sense of the GPL (which it pretends to be but isn't),
you could just look at the sources from which it
Martin Costabel wrote:
Brion Vibber wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Unfortunately, gimp-app does not give any information whether the gtk
build needed to be configured differently. If gimp-app were open
source in the sense of the GPL (which it pretends to be but isn't),
you could just look at
Hi,
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it is good standard practice, in particular on sourceforge
where there is plenty of space, not to wait until users request
sources, but to publish them alongside with the binaries. I don't see
any sources on the gimp-app site; maybe I